Entitlement for refund - malafide intent - suppression, of facts ...

Refund Denied: Malafide Intent and Fact Suppression in Duty Claim on Unmanufactured Goods and Cenvat Credit Valve.

December 12, 2023

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Entitlement for refund - malafide intent - suppression, of facts or not - The appellant knowingly paid the duty and claimed the refund of unmanufactured goods which itself is malafide intention. Secondly, the appellant have not disclosed that the valve on which the cenvat credit was availed has not undergone into the manufacturing process of the finished product. Therefore, there is clear suppression of fact on the part of the appellant. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Entitlement for refund - malafide intent - suppression, of facts ...

Refund Denied: Malafide Intent and Fact Suppression in Duty Claim on Unmanufactured Goods and Cenvat Credit Valve.

December 12, 2023

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Refund of CENVAT credit of CVD and SAD paid by them - appellant has paid the duties only after issuing SCN - there is no allegation of any fraud, collusion or...

Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked....

Re-import of goods - Claim of exemption from customs duty - Whether the original export was under the claim of refund of IGST? - Appellant claimed that at the time of...

CENVAT Credit - Invocation of extended period of limitation - Suppression of facts - mere procedural violations CENVAT credit cannot be denied cannot lease to...

Refund claim - The decision of ITC Limited is not applicable to the present facts and circumstances of the case as at the time of filing of Bills of Entry, the appellant...

100% EOU - de-bonding - refund of the excise duty previously paid - Admittedly, such duty was paid at the time of what is referred to de-bonding. However, this would not...

CESTAT allowed appeal concerning refund of CVD and ACD. Original authority's rejection was based on contradictory findings - accepting CA certificate showing non-passing...

Extended period of limitation - The very fact that the appellant is contesting the issue of invoking larger period of limitation, that the rendering of service under the...

Extended period of limitation - Suppression of facts or not - The returns contained all the requisite details as that of the invoice numbers, the amount of invoice, the...

CESTAT allowed refund of customs duty paid twice through customs broker for same import consignment. Appellant demonstrated through Bill of Entry, payment challans, and...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Mere non-payment of duties is not collusion or willful misstatement or suppression of facts - Article

The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation of five years under proviso to Section 73(1) of the Finance Act could not have been invoked in the present case....

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

Quick Updates: