Doctrine of Merger - the original order dated 26.08.2013 was ...

Original Order Merged with Subsequent Order, Rendering Revenue's Appeal Unsustainable for Judicial Review.

December 13, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

Doctrine of Merger - the original order dated 26.08.2013 was merged with the order dated 01.04.2014 passed by the Tribunal - the doctrine of merger applies to the case in hand and since the order dated 26.08.2013 is no more in existence, in our considered view, the appeal filed by Revenue against such original order cannot be sustained for judicial scrutiny. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Doctrine of Merger - the original order dated 26.08.2013 was ...

Original Order Merged with Subsequent Order, Rendering Revenue's Appeal Unsustainable for Judicial Review.

December 13, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Scope of Judicial Review – Review of the decision of the Settlement Commission - There is limited scope of judicial review - Despite such narrow confines of judicial...

Violation of judicial discipline - reopening and review of previous Tribunal Order for subsequent period - while the accepting the order of tribunal for the earlier...

Provisional attachment of Bank Accounts - lack of application of mind - In the event, the Commissioner refuses to lift the orders of provisional attachment once again,...

The High Court held that while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, it does not assume the role of an appellate authority to conduct a merit...

The AT dismissed the review applications filed for waiver of pre-deposit of penalties under FERA. The appellants' failure to comply with the deposit order justified the...

The High Court considered the scope of review jurisdiction regarding the inclusion of purchase price of plant and machinery in 'Fixed Capital Investment'. Review power...

The case before the Allahabad High Court involved the jurisdiction of the Collector (Stamp) to recall or review an order under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act,...

In the matter under review, the High Court dismissed the review petitions filed by the parties. The Court held that no grounds were established for seeking a review of...

The High Court held that the impugned Press Release by the Ministry of Finance, purporting to direct judicial and quasi-judicial authorities to classify all...

The review petition challenges the order imposing interest liability over the withheld amount and cost on the Managing Director. The court held that reviewing an order...

A review application is maintainable on (i) discovery of new and important evidence which could not be produced earlier despite due diligence, (ii) mistake or error...

The decisions of the Hon’ble non-jurisdictional High Court have no relevance in the present context. It is also elementary in law that the mere pendency of the appeal,...

Seeking review - error apparent on the face of record or not - The High Court held that, these documents were not part of the pleadings. Review does not mean rehearing...

Review of Order after gap of 13 years - delay can be condoned or not - There is a period of one year provided as per the Act, 2003 for seeking review of any order passed...

Review of order - Levy of penalty - grounds for review are that the imposition of penalty by the authorities is not automatic and the same can be imposed only when there...

Quick Updates: