Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Once evidence is produced by ...

Case Laws Central Excise

April 9, 2013

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Once evidence is produced by the respondent that they have borne the incidence of duty whose refund is claimed by them, the burden would shift to the department to prove that the respondent’s claim is not correct. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Once evidence is produced by ...

Case Laws Central Excise

April 9, 2013

You may also like:

Refund of Customs duty - unjust enrichment - Chennai Port Trust (the buyer) had indeed borne the duty burden, as evidenced by financial records and a letter from the...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - value of the software is includable in the assessable value of hardware or not - The duty and the value are shown in the face of...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Refund claim of duty paid on short landing of imported goods. Unjust enrichment principle inapplicable as duty amount shown as receivable in books of accounts, certified...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Simply stating that the goods were sold at a loss does not establish that the duty incidence was not passed - No refund - AT

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - case of appellant is that Since the transaction is of job work and not of sale there is no question of passing of incidence of duty to...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - merely because the Excise duty is booked as expenditure in Profit & Loss account, it cannot be said the incidence of duty has been passed on - AT

Refund claim governed by unjust enrichment principles under Customs Act, 1962. Documentary evidence insufficient to rebut statutory presumption of passing on duty...

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

Refund claim of excess duty denied due to unjust enrichment - goods sold based on LME price index. Revenue contended appellant booked excess duty as revenue expenditure...

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

Eligibility to get refund of excess duty - unjust enrichment - if the credit notes are genuine and had been acted upon resulting in neutralizing the higher incidence of...

Quick Updates: