Register Daily Newsletters My Bookmarks My Queries (D. Forum) My Replies (D. Forum) My Articles My Inbox (PM) Feedback/ Suggestions
Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

   For Sales / Support:
WhatsApp WhatsApp 9911796707
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes
TMI - e-Newsletter     TaxTMI    Income-tax Rules Amended: Form 3CD Gets Major...     TaxTMI    CBIC Revises Tariff Values Under Section 14(2) for...     TaxTMI    Diamond Imprest Authorisation Form Updated with...     TaxTMI    Sea Cargo Manifest Regulations: CBIC Extends...     TaxTMI    CBIC Implements Electronic Processing for Personal...     TaxTMI    CBDT Authorizes Waiver of Interest on Delayed...     TaxTMI    GST Assessment Order Set Aside for Lacking Document...     TaxTMI    SEBI Introduces New Governance Rules for High Value...     TaxTMI    Government exempts Bengal gram from AIDC and SWS...     TaxTMI    CGST Rules Amended: Rule 164 Changes Affect Tax...     TaxTMI    SEBI Eases ESG Compliance: New Green Credit...     TaxTMI    Portfolio Managers Given Extended Timeline of 15...     TaxTMI    CBIC Clarifies Section 128A Waiver Eligibility for...     TaxTMI    Transfer of Development Rights Constitutes...     TaxTMI    GST Fraud Mastermind Denied Bail Under Sections...     TaxTMI    Latest Case-Laws     TaxTMI    Latest Notifications + Circulars     TaxTMI    GST Council Decisions     TaxTMI       Right Stop
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2013 Year 2013 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - When the addition was set aside, there ...


High Court Rules No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) if Income Addition is Overturned, Protecting Taxpayer Rights.

April 10, 2013

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - When the addition was set aside, there was no question of imposition of penalty - HC

View Source

 

← Previous Next →

 

You may also like:

  1. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  2. MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition made on protected assessment - addition in this case was made on protected assessment/addition on estimated basis which is against the law - AT

  4. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

  5. Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed...

  6. The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

  9. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) concerning the correct classification of income. The Assessing Officer treated the income as 'income...

  10. Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

  11. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act is leviable to be imposed only where the assessee has concealed its particulars of income or furnished...

  12. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

  13. Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

  14. The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

  15. The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
F: Taxpayer's GST Payment Through DRC-03 Without Filing DRC-03A Form Rais...
F: Can a Company Cross-Utilize CENVAT Credit Between Two Service Sites Wi...
F: Navigating GST Compliance When Purchasing Soil for Resale from Mining ...
H: SEBI Extends Cybersecurity Framework Compliance Deadline to June 30, 2...
H: SEBI Revises Lock-in Rules for InvIT Preferential Issues and Introduce...
C: SEBI Extends Implementation Timeline for Algorithmic Trading Standards...
F: Taxpayers Can Claim Pre-Deposit Refunds After Favorable GST Appeal Ord...
F: GST Audit Notices Under Section 65: No Time Limits for Department Audi...
A: Evolution of India's Taxation System: From Ancient Principles to Moder...
A: Filing Annual Returns for Private Limited Companies: A Five-Step Proce...
A: Trump's "America First" Policy: How Protectionist Measures Reshaped Gl...
A: ESG Criteria: Measuring Corporate Sustainability Through Environmental...
A: Trump's "America First" Trade Policy: Tariffs, Trade Wars, and Global ...
A: Corporations Must Adopt Multi-Faceted Strategies to Reduce Carbon Emis...
A: Implementing Ten Essential "Green Goods Deeds" to Combat Climate Chang...
A: # Breaking Barriers: How Women in Business Navigate Gender Bias, Capit...
A: Women in STEM: Breaking Barriers and Driving Innovation Through Divers...
A: Our Environmental Choices Today: Creating a Polluted Legacy or Buildin...
H: Bail Granted Under Section 439 CrPC to Young Accused in GST Act Case w...
H: Service Tax Recovery Limited to Three Years as Fraud Not Proven Under ...
H: SCN Issued Two Days Beyond Section 73(2) Deadline Deemed Invalid as Ti...
H: Applicant Granted Bail in GST Case on Parity Grounds with Co-accused U...
H: Tribunal Upholds Business Segmentation for Transfer Pricing, Directs T...
H: Unexplained Income Under Section 69: Losses Can Be Set Off Prior to AY...
H: Reopening Assessment Under Section 147 Invalid When Information Alread...
H: Addition Under Section 69B Deleted: Printout Evidence Insufficient Wit...
H: Chain Wheel and Free Wheel Components: Petition on Import Classificati...
H: Financial Hardship Not Valid Ground for Waiver of Mandatory Pre-Deposi...
H: Exporters Penalized Under FERA for Failing to Ensure Wheat Flour Reach...
H: Revenue Cannot Challenge EOU Refunds Through SCNs Without First Revisi...