Assessment u/s 153A - Addition u/s 68 - as per AO there was a ...

Assessing Officer's Addition Deleted Due to Lack of Seized Evidence and Genuineness of Transaction Confirmed.

January 22, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Assessment u/s 153A - Addition u/s 68 - as per AO there was a seizure of incriminating material and failure of the assessee to prove the genuineness of the transaction - Assessee categorically stated that he has already included the above sum in his total income. In the remand report submitted by the learned Assessing Officer, it is clear that in the Panchnama, it is stated that no document or accounts were found and seized. Further, the remand report also says that addition is made in the hands of the assessee only based on facilitator agreement and receipt reconciliation. - CIT(A) rightly deleted the additions - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Assessment u/s 153A - Addition u/s 68 - as per AO there was a ...

Assessing Officer's Addition Deleted Due to Lack of Seized Evidence and Genuineness of Transaction Confirmed.

January 22, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Addition u/s 69A - cash loans given by the assessee as unexplained - decoding of the entries in the seized materials - The tribunal found that the assessing officer's...

Addition u/s 68 OR 41(1) - unexplained cash credit - Cessation of liability - The appellant contested additions to their income, alleging bogus sundry creditors. Despite...

The assessee's contentions were upheld by the Tribunal regarding various additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal ruled that the RTGS transfer from the...

The assessee successfully discharged the onus u/s 68 regarding share capital introduced by the company director, a major shareholder, proving identity, creditworthiness,...

Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

Assessment u/s 153A - Validity examined. Assessments cannot be framed without incriminating material found during search u/s 132. Completed assessments u/s 143(3) cannot...

Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D - The assessing officer's reliance on CBDT Circular No. 5 of 2014 to make disallowance u/s 14A is legally untenable and liable to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the appellant, during reassessment proceedings, had filed their return of income but failed to provide...

The assessee was allowed to claim depreciation on assets held in the name of directors, based on the principle of beneficial ownership recognized by the Supreme Court....

The assessee's reconciliation explained total purchases, including capital goods and purchase returns, tallying with recorded purchases. The Tribunal correctly held that...

Addition u/s 68 cannot be made solely based on sworn statement recorded u/s 132(4) without corroborative materials. Onus lies on the Department to collect cogent...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

Bogus loss from trading in shares/securities - ITAT observed that, despite the appellant's submission of evidences during the assessment proceedings, the assessing...

Digital images and Excel files found on partner's phone cannot be relied upon for making additions u/s 69C for unexplained expenditure. Loose papers and documents not...

Assessment u/s 153A - Addition u/s 69A by the Assessing Officer on account of difference in amount credited in bank and sale proceeds shown in the income tax return. It...

Quick Updates: