Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) - non filling up of Part 'B' of the ...

Court Quashes Penalty for Incomplete e-Way Bill, Cites No Tax Evasion Intent and Ministry of Finance Support.

January 31, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - Referencing the judgment in M/s Citykart Retail Pvt. Ltd.'s case, the Court observed that the sole allegation was the non-filling of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill without any tax evasion intent. The explanation provided by the petitioner, supported by Ministry of Finance Circulars addressing issues in filling Part 'B', suggested no intent to evade tax. - Observing the absence of tax evasion intent, the High Court quashed and set aside the orders.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) - non filling up of Part 'B' of the ...

Court Quashes Penalty for Incomplete e-Way Bill, Cites No Tax Evasion Intent and Ministry of Finance Support.

January 31, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The Rajasthan High Court considered a case involving the detention of goods due to an expired e-way bill, raising concerns about tax evasion. Citing a judgment from the...

HC set aside penalty orders under GST Act Section 129(1) and allowed refund application. The appellate authority's dismissal was deemed unjustified as there was no clear...

Detention of goods alongwith penalty - Expired e-way Bill - The High Court noted that the goods were indeed covered by a tax invoice and e-way bill, with the expiration...

Penalty order - wrongful mention of place of supply in E-Way bills - intent to evade tax or not - The High Court noted that the incorrect address mentioned in the E-Way...

Penalty order - Part-B of the e-way bill was not filled up - intent to evade tax - The High court, referencing a previous judgment, ruled that such technical errors, in...

Levy of penalty - Compliance with the E-Way bill as required under the provisions of the CGST/UPGST Act and related rule or not - presumption of tax evasion in its...

Levy of penalty - at the time of detention was that one of the E-Way Bills had expired - The High court held that mens rea to evade tax is essential for imposing...

The High Court quashed the orders of the Appellate and Adjudicating Authorities imposing penalty on the petitioner for transporting goods after the expiry of the e-way...

The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

Levy of Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - Errors in e-way bills - The Court emphasized that minor typographical errors in e-way bills,...

Detention of goods due to incomplete Part B of E-way bill. No dispute on documents/goods. Part B filled before notice/seizure order. No mens rea found to evade tax....

The case involved a challenge to a penalty imposed u/s 129 of the Goods and Service Tax Acts. The court held that without proof of intent to evade tax, such penalties...

Levy of penalty - goods were unloaded at a place that was not registered in the registration certificate - unloading goods at a location not specified in the e-way bill...

Evasion of tax - mismatch in the e-way bill and the branch transfer invoice - levy of penalty and tax on the petitioner - The High Court observed that, even if there was...

Evasion of tax - Failure to produce the e-Way Bill in time due to certain technical difficulties - although the petitioner failed to generate the e-Way Bill on time, the...

Quick Updates: