Detention of goods due to incomplete Part B of E-way bill. No ...

Goods detained for incomplete E-way bill. No intent to evade tax. No penalty under sec 129(3) for technical error. HC quashed orders.

Case Laws GST

August 8, 2024

Detention of goods due to incomplete Part B of E-way bill. No dispute on documents/goods. Part B filled before notice/seizure order. No mens rea found to evade tax. Citing M/S ROLI ENTERPRISES case, technical error without tax evasion intent warrants no penalty u/s 129(3). Similar ruling in PRECISION TOOLS INDIA case. Orders dated April 22, 2021 and November 20, 2021 quashed by HC. Writ petition allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Detention of goods due to incomplete Part B of E-way bill. No ...

Goods detained for incomplete E-way bill. No intent to evade tax. No penalty under sec 129(3) for technical error. HC quashed orders.

Case Laws GST

August 8, 2024

You may also like:

Levy of penalty - at the time of detention was that one of the E-Way Bills had expired - The High court held that mens rea to evade tax is essential for imposing...

Imposition of tax and penalty u/s 129(3) - e-way bill had expired nine hours and thirty minutes prior to interception - The High court referred to previous cases where...

Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - goods detained on the ground that the goods were being transported on a vehicle different from...

Levy of penalty - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - existence of mens rea or not The High Court referenced a specific case and highlighted that the issue of...

Levy of penalty for violation of section 129 and Rule 138 - Failure to update the E-way bill on change of vehicle after breakdown - The imposition of penalties for mere...

Detention of goods - penalty order - Part B of the E-Way Bill was not filled up - The High court observed that the department failed to prove any intention on the...

Levy of Penalty order u/s 129(3) - Neither in the SCN nor in the order u/s 129(3) there was any allegation that non downloading of E-way Bill-02 was done with intention...

Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - Referencing the judgment in M/s Citykart Retail Pvt. Ltd.'s case, the Court observed that the...

Levy of penalty - e-way bill had expired four days prior to the date of detention - existence of mens rea - The High Court found no evidence of intent to evade tax in...

Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 - petitioner has generated E-way bill by declaring the consignee as its additional place of business - intent to evade...

Levy of Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - Errors in e-way bills - The Court emphasized that minor typographical errors in e-way bills,...

Detention of goods on onward journey - detention on ground goods dispatched to different place than mentioned in documents - levy of penalty u/s 129 of UPGST Act -...

Levy of penalty - goods were seized goods for not accompanied by E-way bills - Upon a purposive reading of the sections 129, 130 and 138, it would suffice to state that...

High Court held that since there was no intent to evade tax and the error in e-way bill was merely typographical, penalty imposed u/s 129(3) of CGST Act was unjustified....

Penalty order - Part-B of the e-way bill was not filled up - intent to evade tax - The High court, referencing a previous judgment, ruled that such technical errors, in...

Quick Updates: