Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2024 Year 2024 This

Levy of penalty - confiscation of goods - The High court held ...


Goods with Forged WPC License Confiscated Under Customs Act; Strict Liability Imposes Penalty Without Intent.

February 2, 2024

Case Laws     Customs     HC

Levy of penalty - confiscation of goods - The High court held that the goods imported without a valid Wireless Planning & Coordination (WPC) license, which turned out to be forged, were rightly liable for confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. The High court found that the imposition of a redemption fine and penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act did not require mens rea (intent) and was based on a strict liability principle.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Forged import licence - Imposition of penalty - Though the WPC approvals were not appropriately issued, the investigations have not brought out categorically whether the...

  2. Confiscation - fine - penalty - Mis-declaring the quantity of cigarettes imported under warehouse bill of entry for re-export purpose - The customs authorities...

  3. CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

  4. Appellant's customs broker license revoked, security deposit forfeited, and penalty of Rs. 50,000 imposed by Commissioner due to submission of forged graduation degree...

  5. Customs authorities issued show cause notice based solely on letter doubting authenticity of DEPB licenses, without conducting investigation to establish alleged forgery....

  6. Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

  7. The penalty imposed u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellant (a Customs Broker) for abetting the clearance of undeclared/mis-declared export goods was...

  8. Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

  9. The key holdings were: 1) Since the goods (areca nuts) were absolutely confiscated, the demand for duty on the appellants is unsustainable. 2) Penalty u/s 114A of the...

  10. Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

  11. Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is...

  12. Demanding differential custom duty on account of correct valuation of the car - import of second hand car - liability of importer vs liability of subsequent owner - The...

  13. Imposition of penalty under Section 78 - Merely because penalty under Section 78 has been imposed for the earlier period, no penalty can be imposed for any subsequent...

  14. Denial of benefit of Value Based Advance Licenses (VABAL) to the appellants-transferees and the recovery of customs duty, along with the imposition of penalties. The key...

  15. Appellant financed an individual for smuggling gold from Dubai and selling it in India. Penalty was imposed u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner held...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates