Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

Denial of benefit of Value Based Advance Licenses (VABAL) to the ...


Tribunal Rules in Favor of Transferees, Overturns Customs Duty Recovery and Penalties Due to Invalid Grounds.

September 11, 2024

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Denial of benefit of Value Based Advance Licenses (VABAL) to the appellants-transferees and the recovery of customs duty, along with the imposition of penalties. The key points are: The DGFT authorities took action on certain licenses, but there was no indication of cancellation by them for the three VABAL licenses in question. The impugned order directing duty recovery has no legal basis and is contrary to CBEC instructions. The Tribunal held that since the VABAL licenses were not obtained through fraud, the ratio of the Supreme Court case involving forged documents does not apply. The DGFT authorities issued amendments for the three licenses, indicating they were not found to involve forgery. Precedents establish that if licenses were valid at import time, subsequent cancellation on fraud grounds does not impact the transferee. The benefit of notification cannot be denied to the transferee on the ground of breach of conditions. Consequently, the impugned order confirming demands, interest, and penalties is unsustainable, and the appeal is allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Demand of excise duty and penalty – recovery of dues from the auction purchaser unit in terms of Rule 230(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 - recovery proceedings dropped - HC

  2. The appellants, a customs warehousing station, faced a fire incident resulting in the loss of certain goods. The customs duty amount on the lost goods was paid by the...

  3. Classification of imported goods - Narrow Woven Fabric Webbing - The tribunal noted that the appellant's actions in misclassifying goods from a specific country...

  4. Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

  5. Customs duty levied on imported goods destroyed by fire in SEZ units. SEZ units procured duty-free goods indigenously, availing exemptions under SEZ Act, 2005 and Rules,...

  6. CESTAT partly allowed appeal concerning duty demands on DTA sales by SEZ unit. Court held Commissioner of Customs has jurisdiction to demand duty on unauthorized DTA...

  7. Recovery of differential duty (SAD) u/s 28(1) of CA for the imports made in all the Bills of Entry along with interest and penalties - The Tribunal confirmed the...

  8. The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

  9. Benefit of reduced penalty of 15% u/s 28(5) - Delay in payment of penalty due to Public Holiday - The appellant voluntarily paid the differential BCD and interest upon...

  10. Revocation of Customs Broker License - Overvaluation and misdeclaration with intent to claim drawback under section 75 of Customs Act, 1962 - The tribunal acknowledged...

  11. The case involved a penalty u/s 112(B) of the Customs Act, 1962 against an employee of a Customs House Agent (CHA) for allegedly concealing information affecting a bill...

  12. Duty demand u/s 28(1) of Customs Act, 1962, upon importer and transferee of license issued by DGFT - Liability of transferee for fraudulently obtained license - Levy of...

  13. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for under reporting income - defective notice - The Tribunal agrees with the appellant's argument, emphasizing that the AO did not apply his mind...

  14. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) concerning the correct classification of income. The Assessing Officer treated the income as 'income...

  15. The CESTAT Kolkata, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving a Customs Broker accused of illegal activities leading to the forfeiture of their security deposit...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates