Unaccounted interest payment on cash loan - search and seizure ...

Tribunal Rules Insufficient Evidence in Interest Payment Case, Upholds Deletion of Additions Due to Lack of Corroboration.

February 6, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Unaccounted interest payment on cash loan - search and seizure action u/s 132 - loose paper seized from the premises of an employee - Tally printouts - 'dump document' - The tribunal found that the documents in question were insufficiently linked to the assessee, lacked corroborative evidence, and were not conclusively indicative of unaccounted transactions. Additionally, the failure to allow cross-examination further weakened the AO's case. - Consequently, the tribunal confirmed the order of CIT(A) for deletion of the additions.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Unaccounted interest payment on cash loan - search and seizure ...

Tribunal Rules Insufficient Evidence in Interest Payment Case, Upholds Deletion of Additions Due to Lack of Corroboration.

February 6, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) under section 195, specifically disallowance under section 40(a)(i) for payments labeled as...

Correctness of erasure of credit already availed by prospective invalidation of eligibility for retention of credit that would subject those services already procured...

Interest liability - seeking waiver of interest since the payment of service tax was paid under the amnesty scheme - The tribunal observed that the appellant's payment...

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal. Regarding the transfer pricing adjustment for interest charged on loans, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of the adjustment,...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

The Appellate Tribunal considered TP adjustment on brokerage commission received from related parties. It found TNMM method appropriate for benchmarking the commission...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed two key issues. Firstly, regarding the addition u/s 68, it was found that the investors' transactions were genuine, evidenced by banking...

The ITAT held that the CIT (A) erred in admitting additional evidence without following Rule 46A. Deletion of additions on forfeited amount and various expenses was...

The tribunal affirmed the decision of the CIT(A) to admit additional evidence under Rule 46A, leading to the deletion of disallowance on depreciation claims....

The case involved a claim for refund of interest u/s 72 of Finance Act, 2010 to benefit from a retrospective amendment to Rule 6 of CCR, 2002/2004. The Tribunal held...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowances in the quantum assessment order - whether any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars proved? - Tribunal directs...

The Appellate Tribunal held that denial of interest on delayed refund of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) was incorrect. Lower authorities misinterpreted section 244A(1)...

The assessee failed to deduct tax on professional fees paid to various non-residents. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the fees were liable to tax in India under the...

Recovery of premium dues, interest, default interest, penal interest, interest overdue etc. - priority of charges - The tribunal analyzes the relevant clauses of the...

Quick Updates: