The ITAT held that the CIT (A) erred in admitting additional ...

CIT(A) deleted additions without following Rule 46A. Deletion on forfeited amount & various expenses upheld. Disallowance u/s 14A restricted.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 6, 2024

The ITAT held that the CIT (A) erred in admitting additional evidence without following Rule 46A. Deletion of additions on forfeited amount and various expenses was justified. The Delhi High Court precedent supported treating forfeited advance as business expenditure. The CIT (A) deleted disallowance of various expenses due to lack of AO's remand report. The ITAT upheld the deletion of disallowance u/s 14A. The case was remanded to CIT (A) for compliance with Rule 46A and fresh decision on specified grounds.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT held that the CIT (A) erred in admitting additional ...

CIT(A) deleted additions without following Rule 46A. Deletion on forfeited amount & various expenses upheld. Disallowance u/s 14A restricted.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 6, 2024

You may also like:

Addition being 40% of cash balance shown in the balance sheet as income of the assessee - A.O without any basis, simply says that the cash in hand is excessive and...

CIT(A) determined profit at 5.47% on total purchases. Assessee produced sufficient evidence regarding purchases, movement of goods, GST payment on transportation,...

Protective addition made by Assessing Officer was not sustainable as substantive addition did not survive in concluded assessment proceedings of related party. CIT(A)...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

The assessment reopening u/s 147 read with Section 148 was found to be unsustainable due to the lack of independent application of mind by the Commissioner of Income Tax...

IT, Estimation of income without rejecting books of accounts is arbitrary, addition made by AO deleted

The CIT(A) partly allowed and restricted the addition on account of commission expenses at 0.25% as compared to 2% adopted by the Assessing Officer. The coordinate bench...

Addition u/s 56(2)(viia)(ii) - determination of fair market value of shares - Method of valuation - Addition towards difference between FMV and actual amount paid for...

Protective assessment/addition - No substantive assessment/addition in the hands of other assessee - It is therefore a case where no substantive additions have been made...

Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

This is a summary of an order from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dealing with various additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and...

Genuineness of expenditure - CIT(A) deleted the additions - CIT(A) went into detail to evaluate the identity of commission recipient and genuineness of expenditure of...

Protective assessment - Addition u/s 69/69C - Unaccounted investment ad unaccounted commission - CIT(A) has confirmed the substantive additions on the three entities so...

The assessee failed to deduct tax on professional fees paid to various non-residents. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the fees were liable to tax in India under the...

Cessation of liability - Additions u/s. 41(1) - waiver towards outstanding principal loan amount - waiver of outstanding principal loan amount is a capital receipt or...

Quick Updates: