Addition proposed in the draft assessment order as TP adjustment ...

Draft Assessment Order Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedures for Transfer Pricing Adjustments.

February 19, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Addition proposed in the draft assessment order as TP adjustment - Non following mandatory provisions of Sec. 144C while issuing draft assessment order - The ITAT found merit in the assessee's argument, holding that the assessment order was void as the AO failed to follow the mandatory procedure laid down under Section 144C of the Act. The ITAT referred to various judicial precedents, including decisions of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court and other ITAT decisions, supporting this view.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition proposed in the draft assessment order as TP adjustment ...

Draft Assessment Order Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedures for Transfer Pricing Adjustments.

February 19, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Validity of faceless assessment - authorities have failed to comply with the mandatory procedure laid down u/s 144B - The compliance of mandatory procedure as envisaged...

TP Adjustment - Non follow procedure u/s.144C - Non referring to TPO - only draft assessment order passed - Draft assessment order cannot be treated as final assessment...

Procedure for use of digital signature on records and invoices-reg - Draft Notification and Circular

The ITAT held that the final assessment order under s.143(3) was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to issue a mandatory draft assessment order under s.144C(1) for...

HC examined procedural compliance in tax assessment proceedings. The court determined that the order dated March 30, 2021 constituted a draft assessment order rather...

Allegedly transfer of shares - Right to transfer the shares - Non compliance with section 108 of the Companies Act, 1956 - company cannot be faulted for non...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

The Bombay High Court addressed non-compliance with Rule 28 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 regarding timely registration and disposal of applications u/s 94 and 95 of the...

Smuggling - Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure under Section 42 of the NDPS Act - Violation of Section 50 - The Supreme Court ruled that since the search and...

Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance - The assessee has shown sufficient cause for non-compliance, moreover, such non-compliance was done by...

Non-Bailable Warrants of Arrest - The procedure adopted by the Tribunal is in conformity with the NCLT Rules, 2016 as well as order XVI Rule 10 of the Code of Civil...

The CESTAT held that confiscation of gold and penalties imposed on the appellant were unjustified. The tribunal found that the Revenue's case relied primarily on...

Rectification in the register of members - transfer of shares - execution of valid transfer deeds within the meaning of Section 108 is a mandatory requirement of a valid...

Dismissal of appeal - alleged defect, for non-compliance of mandatory pre-deposit in terms of Section 129E of the Customs Act - the appeals filed by them have been...

Quick Updates: