Imposition of penalty and confiscation/redemption fine - ...

Penalties for Repairing Pipes in Wrong Location; TSA Bond Violation Not Covered u/s 111(J) Clarified.

February 24, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

Imposition of penalty and confiscation/redemption fine - repairing works for risers and pipes - repair activity done at DTA location instead of designated EOU location - violation of TSA bond furnished by ONGC - The Tribunal held that, Section 111(J) comes into operation only when goods are removed from the customs area or warehouse without permission or contrary to the permission already granted. It does not deal with the warehouse goods in transit with which the above regulations i.e. Warehoused Goods (Removable) Regulations, 1963 have been provided and which make the goods dutiable in the hands of persons executing bond for any violation of conditions of bond. - As far as appellants are concerned, if intention was to evade service-tax, then show cause notice should have been issued under relevant provisions including penal provisions of Finance Act, 1994.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty and confiscation/redemption fine - ...

Penalties for Repairing Pipes in Wrong Location; TSA Bond Violation Not Covered u/s 111(J) Clarified.

February 24, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Non-payment of Service Tax - Mentioning of wrong service tax registration in the payment challan for two months - Mentioning of wrong location code - in view of the...

Waste and scrap - Regardless of the fact that the use of pipes is essential for production of oil, the pipes by themselves are capital goods and are not inputs. When...

Release of detained goods alongwith the vehicle - condition of furnishing the Bank Guarantee with bond - It is quite clear that second option of furnishing the security...

Demand against violation of bond conditions - Warehousing of goods imported - The appellant has furnished E.P copy of the shipping bill as proof of export. The appellant...

The appellant imported goods declared as 'Low Aromatic White Spirit' classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 2710 1990, while the adjudicating authority...

Seeking re-export of goods - Absolute confiscation of goods - breach of ‘intellectual property rights’ - The tribunal found that while the goods were correctly...

Confiscation - redemption fine - penalty - The appellant has contravened the provisions of Section 17 and 46(4) of the Act by intentionally filing wrong declarations and...

Confiscation of smuggled gold bars/biscuits u/ss 111(b), 111(d), and 111(f) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellants failed to establish the licit procurement of the...

CESTAT Bangalore held that goods of foreign origin imported for repairs and return are eligible for exemption under the Notification No.153/1994. The appellant imported...

Classification dispute involving imported SVPS Chillers - whether to be classified under CTH 84198940 or not, and eligibility for exemption notification dated 17.03.2012....

Valuation of imported hair-oil - clearance without MRP stickers - such valuation attracted Sections 111(d) and 111(m) and thus, properly resulted in penalty and confiscation - HC

Imposition of penalty u/s 112(b) of Customs Act, 1962 - goods were duly covered by prescribed job work documents and the same were also taken on record in the books of...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Penalty - whether wrong mentioning of provisions for invoking penalty would render the order illegal – Held No - tribunal is wrong in deleting the penalty - HC

The circular addresses the entitlement of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by insurance companies on repair expenses for motor vehicles in reimbursement mode of claim settlement....

Quick Updates: