Levy of penalty of 200% u/s 129 - Bonafide belief - intention to ...

High Court rules 200% penalty u/s 129 unwarranted for brief e-way bill delay in export to Bangladesh.

February 26, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Levy of penalty of 200% u/s 129 - Bonafide belief - intention to evade tax - expiration of the e-way bill - exported to Bangladesh - On the date and time when the vehicle was intercepted, the vehicle did not have a valid e-way bill - The High Court concluded that the circumstances did not warrant a 200% penalty imposition, considering the short delay and the absence of evidence of intent to contravene the law.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty of 200% u/s 129 - Bonafide belief - intention to ...

High Court rules 200% penalty u/s 129 unwarranted for brief e-way bill delay in export to Bangladesh.

February 26, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Challenge to penalty order u/s 129(1) of CGST Act for non-generation of Part-B of E-way bill. Petitioner accepted notice and paid Rs. 11,08,150 penalty voluntarily...

Levy of 200% penalty - Failure to renew e-Way Bill - The appellants should have done since the goods were sold in transit. Therefore, there is a violation had committed...

Imposition of tax and penalty u/s 129(3) - e-way bill had expired nine hours and thirty minutes prior to interception - The High court referred to previous cases where...

HC permitted petitioner to file statutory appeal u/s 107 of TNGST Act within 30 days. Penalty of 200% of seized goods value imposed u/s 129(1)(a) for transporting goods...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Levy of penalty @200% - e-way bill which was generated by the appellant had expired and at the time when the vehicle was intercepted four days had lapsed - The High...

The Rajasthan High Court considered a case involving the detention of goods due to an expired e-way bill, raising concerns about tax evasion. Citing a judgment from the...

Procedural irregularities without fraudulent intent do not warrant harsh penalties u/s 129 of GST enactments. HC quashed impugned order due to procedural nature of...

The petitioner failed to amend the invoice and e-way bill to reflect the actual goods loaded on the vehicle, resulting in discrepancies in GST documentation. The High...

Levy of penalty - the e-way bill had expired one hour fifteen minutes prior to interception - The High Court acknowledged that while the e-way bill had expired, the...

Levy of penalty - e-way bill had expired four days prior to the date of detention - existence of mens rea - The High Court found no evidence of intent to evade tax in...

HC upheld penalty u/s 129(3) of WB GST Act 2017 due to deliberate discrepancies in transportation documents. The E-way bill listed an unregistered person (URP) as...

Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - goods detained on the ground that the goods were being transported on a vehicle different from...

Levy of penalty equal to 200% - Detention of consignments - quantity of the boxes were lesser than the quantity shown in the document - levying penalty on the entire...

Seeking release of detained goods - delayed generation of E-way bill - the department has proceeded to determine the tax liability as well as penalty only u/s 129, which...

Quick Updates: