Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax ...

Case Laws GST

February 22, 2024

Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - goods detained on the ground that the goods were being transported on a vehicle different from that declared on e-way bill - onus to prove (shifting burden on petitioner) - The High Court held that, the intention to evade tax is sine qua non before imposition of penalty. I - Based on the lack of evidence demonstrating an intention to evade tax and the adherence to tax regulations by the petitioner, the High Court quashes the orders imposing penalties under Section 129(3) of the Act and allows the writ petition.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax ...

Case Laws GST

February 22, 2024

You may also like:

Seizure of goods - goods seized on the ground that U.P. e-way bill was not accompanying the goods - section 129(3) of UPGST Act - On close, scrutiny of the record...

The High Court addressed penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 following premises search. Relying on precedent, the Court held that...

Penalty order u/s 129(3) - non-filling up of Part B of e-way bill - Stock transfer - Since the goods in question were stock transfer from one Unit to another within the...

Levy of Penalty order u/s 129(3) - Neither in the SCN nor in the order u/s 129(3) there was any allegation that non downloading of E-way Bill-02 was done with intention...

Imposition of tax and penalty u/s 129(3) - e-way bill had expired nine hours and thirty minutes prior to interception - The High court referred to previous cases where...

Detention of goods alongwith conveyance - If the goods are intercepted during transit and the documents accompanying the goods are not in compliance with the provisions...

Detention order - challenge on the short ground that the impugned proceedings are barred by the limitation prescribed under Section 129(3) of the GST Act, 2017 - the...

Bid-rigging cartel involving Toyfort, Austere Systems, and Fimo Info Solutions in soil testing tenders floated by Uttar Pradesh Agriculture Department contravened...

Detention/seizure of vehicle alongwith the goods - the provisions of Section 129 (3) require the proper officer detaining or seizing the goods to issue a notice...

Goods detained on ground of non-generation of E-Tax Invoice as per Rule 48 of GST Rules before movement; all required documents u/r 138A accompanied goods; technical...

Release of detained goods - Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act - the competent authority is directed to complete the adjudication provided for u/s 129...

Seizure order - Section 129(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - in the matter of seizure under the provisions of IGST Act the provisions of...

Jurisdiction - Power to confiscate goods - The power to detain under Section 129 cannot be converted to a proceeding under Section 130 of the Act since both these...

Seizure of detained goods - Absence of E-Way bill - e-way bill-02 furnished immediately within 20 minutes from the time of the detention of the vehicle/goods - Since the...

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, dealt with a case involving cartelization and bid-rigging in tenders for soil sample testing by the Department of...

Quick Updates: