Automatic Vacation of the interim order / Stay Order after six ...

Interim Orders Sustain Beyond Six Months; Supreme Court Stresses Judicial Review for Changes or Cancellations.

March 2, 2024

Case Laws Indian Laws SC

Automatic Vacation of the interim order / Stay Order after six months - judicial legislation or not - The Supreme Court held that interim orders cannot automatically expire due to the lapse of time. Fundamental principles of natural justice require that any modification or vacation of such orders must occur through judicial examination, ensuring fairness to all parties involved. - The Court highlighted that while Article 142 empowers the Supreme Court to pass orders for doing complete justice, it cannot be used to annul lawful judicial orders en masse without considering individual case merits and the rights of those not present before the Court.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Automatic Vacation of the interim order / Stay Order after six ...

Interim Orders Sustain Beyond Six Months; Supreme Court Stresses Judicial Review for Changes or Cancellations.

March 2, 2024

Case Laws Indian Laws SC

You may also like:

Validity of search and seizure - impugned SCN issued beyond the period of six months - The contention that the impugned show cause notice is liable to be set aside...

CENVAT Credit - invoices beyond six months - Rule 4(7) of CCR, 2004 - the time restriction of six months would not apply to the invoices issued prior to 01/09/2014

HC upheld rejection of rectification application filed under Section 35C(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Following precedent set in Hongo India Pvt Ltd case, court...

Registration u/s 12AA - Period of six months is not mandatory - The order of ITAT in holding that registration was deemed to have been granted on not passing order in...

Provisional attachment orders u/s 281B were passed on 10.01.2024, valid for six months. The respondents were empowered to extend the provisional attachment for two more...

Non compliance of the provisions of the Company Law Board Regulations, 1991. - reconsideration of such ad-interim order passed by the CLB cannot be said to be reviewing...

Scope of Judicial Review – Review of the decision of the Settlement Commission - There is limited scope of judicial review - Despite such narrow confines of judicial...

Cancellation of GST registration without providing opportunity to be heard violated principles of natural justice. Appeal filed by petitioner rejected due to expiry of...

The High Court held that the penalty order u/s 271D was barred by limitation as the order imposing penalty was required to be passed within six months from the end of...

Rectification u/s 254 - period of limitation - ITAT does not have any power to pass an order u/s 254(2) of the Act beyond a period of six months from the end of the...

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order...

Review of Order after gap of 13 years - delay can be condoned or not - There is a period of one year provided as per the Act, 2003 for seeking review of any order passed...

Validity of Attachment of Petitioner's Properties Post Assessment Order Set Aside and Refund Adjustment - Provisional attachment - after expiry of period of six months...

Review petition - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Tribunal sustaining the levy without providing an opportunity of hearing - Review applicant had paid entire tax amount...

Claim of depreciation beyond six years for the first time - There is no provision under law to make assessment of an assessee beyond six years. Therefore, claim made by...

Quick Updates: