Refund claim - Principles of unjust enrichment - Imported goods ...

Tribunal Allows Refund Claim for Wireless Telephones, Dismisses Penalty, and Rejects Unjust Enrichment Argument.

March 5, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

Refund claim - Principles of unjust enrichment - Imported goods as ''wireless telephone'' - The Tribunal's findings indicated that the appellant had paid duty without waiting for a show cause notice, leading to the penalty being set aside. Thus, denial of refund based on non-appeal against Order-in-original 36/2004 was deemed incorrect. - The Tribunal found no merit in denying the refund on the ground of unjust enrichment. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief, if any, as per law.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - Principles of unjust enrichment - Imported goods ...

Tribunal Allows Refund Claim for Wireless Telephones, Dismisses Penalty, and Rejects Unjust Enrichment Argument.

March 5, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

The case involved a dispute over a refund claim u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim did...

Adjustment of Penalties from Refund amount - After an appellate order allowed redemption of the seized currency upon payment of fines and penalties, the appellant filed...

Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant realized that he has paid excess duty thereafter he filed the refund application under Section 11B of the...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

The assessee claimed that no capital gain was chargeable on receipt from transfer of trademark as there was no cost of acquisition. However, the tribunal held that the...

CESTAT allowed appeal concerning refund of CVD and ACD. Original authority's rejection was based on contradictory findings - accepting CA certificate showing non-passing...

Refund of excess tax paid - The refund claim under 11B was rejected by the Original Authority on the ground that the claim cannot be modified by the appellant to include...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

CESTAT dismissed appeal concerning refund claim of unutilized Cenvat Credit under s.142(3) of CGST Act, read with Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules and s.11B of Central...

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

Lesser sanction of refund claim and non-payment of interest - The department was required to sanction the amount as claimed in the original refund application, which was...

Refund claim of service tax paid - classification of services - Claiming a refund of the amount paid as tax as per their understanding of law cannot be disputed now -...

The ITAT Mumbai considered a case involving a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found the...

Claim of interest on refund - Refund claim was adjusted towards penalty imposed - claim of interest allowed - HC

Quick Updates: