Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - share capital/share premium ...

Tribunal Orders Deletion of Additions Due to AO's Inadequate Investigation of Share Capital Cash Credits.

March 5, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - share capital/share premium receipts - Despite substantial evidence provided by the appellant, including bank statements, share allotment documents, and resolutions of the board of directors, the AO failed to conduct further investigation, particularly after being informed of the change in the registered office address of the investing company. The Tribunal notes the reliance by the AO on the non-production of directors of the investing company for making the addition, without adequately considering the evidence provided by the appellant. - Additions directed to be deleted.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - share capital/share premium ...

Tribunal Orders Deletion of Additions Due to AO's Inadequate Investigation of Share Capital Cash Credits.

March 5, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Unsecured loans - Additions u/s 69 as unexplained expenditure - the tribunal finds that the ld. CIT(A) rightly deleted the impugned additions as the AO failed to...

Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - Method of Valuation - share premium receipts - The Tribunal noted that the appellant had obtained a valuation report from a registered valuer,...

Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction...

Section 263 revision - derivative transactions losses - inadequate inquiry by Assessing Officer (AO). Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) set aside AO's order for...

Addition u/s 68 - the Tribunal noted the extensive documentary evidence provided by the assessee to establish the legitimacy of the loan transactions. However, the AO...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of addition u/s 68 for alleged bogus LTCG from sale of shares. The Tribunal noted that the transactions were conducted on a...

The assessing officer (AO) is empowered u/s 275(1A) to revise the penalty order by giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee within six months from the...

The ITAT considered an addition made u/s 68 for the sale of shares as an 'unexplained source of investment'. The assessee, a foreign company tax resident of Mauritius,...

The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions made by the AO regarding alleged bogus charges for installation of electricity poles and purchases. The Tribunal found...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed the issue of addition u/s 68 regarding penny stock transactions. The genuineness of share transactions was questioned, with the assessee...

AO failed to examine details, relied solely on assessee's submissions, resulting in erroneous assessment prejudicial to Revenue's interests. Assessee borrowed...

ITAT reversed AO's addition under section 68 regarding alleged bogus long-term capital gains (LTCG). The tribunal found insufficient evidence to reject taxpayer's claim...

The assessee failed to deduct tax on professional fees paid to various non-residents. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the fees were liable to tax in India under the...

The Appellate Tribunal considered TP adjustment on brokerage commission received from related parties. It found TNMM method appropriate for benchmarking the commission...

The Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct relevant inquiries regarding the shares held as penny stocks by the assessee in GCM Securities Ltd. The Principal...

Quick Updates: