The assessing officer (AO) is empowered u/s 275(1A) to revise ...

Assessing Officer Must Revise Penalty Orders Within 6 Months Following Appellate or Revision Order Changes.

December 16, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The assessing officer (AO) is empowered u/s 275(1A) to revise the penalty order by giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee within six months from the receipt of an appellate or revision order modifying the assessment. In the event the order passed by the Tribunal is modified by the High Court, the AO is required to give effect to the High Court's judgment by invoking Section 275(1A) and revise the penalty order accordingly. The CIT(A) correctly followed the Coordinate Bench decision and deleted the proportionate penalty levied by the AO to the extent of additions not confirmed by the Appellate Tribunal. The Revenue failed to demonstrate any stay order issued by the High Court against the Tribunal's order. Hence, the CIT(A)'s order confirming the penalty to the extent of additions confirmed by the Appellate Tribunal is upheld, and the Revenue's ground is dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The assessing officer (AO) is empowered u/s 275(1A) to revise ...

Assessing Officer Must Revise Penalty Orders Within 6 Months Following Appellate or Revision Order Changes.

December 16, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

Revision u/s 263 - merger of the order - the entire issue of limited scrutiny, reasons for selection, the Bank accounts in questions were before the ld. Pr. CIT. On this...

The High Court held that the penalty order u/s 271D was barred by limitation as the order imposing penalty was required to be passed within six months from the end of...

The High Court held that the appellate authority erred in enhancing the tax liability payable by the appellant/assessee in an appeal filed by the assessee without...

Sub-section (5) and sub-section (6) inserted in section 16 of CGST Act retrospectively extend the time limit to avail input tax credit in certain specified cases...

The Tribunal held that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was barred by limitation and quashed it. As per Section 144C(13) read with Section 143(3),...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the appellant, during reassessment proceedings, had filed their return of income but failed to provide...

Central Government notifies special procedure for rectification of orders issued u/ss 73, 74, 107, 108 confirming demand for wrong availment of input tax credit....

Penalty proceedings u/s 271D, 271E and 271AAA - period of limitation - the period of six months from the end of the month in which action for imposition of penalty was...

AO has passed the impugned order under section 220(2) without giving effect to the order of the CIT(A). It appears that the Assessing Officer has deliberately not passed...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

Penalty u/s 270A was imposed by disallowing 30% of indexed cost of development expenses concerning Long Term Capital Gain offered by the assessee due to failure to...

The High Court allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the order imposing penalty u/s 271DA for contravention of Section 269ST was passed beyond the statutory...

Computation of MAT credit - Assessee has relied on the ITR–6 format to arrive at the total liability as well as the MAT credit calculations and paid tax accordingly. In...

Validity of order u/s 263 - power of CIT - Once the Assessing Officer has followed a decision of jurisdictional High Court , then there was no jurisdiction to revise...

Quick Updates: