Impleading of the Jurisdictional Commissioner as another ...

Case Laws Customs

March 11, 2024

Impleading of the Jurisdictional Commissioner as another respondent alongwith Commissioner (Adjudication) - The Tribunal examined Rule 12 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, which states who may be joined as respondents. It was clarified that the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner concerned should be impleaded as the respondent. The Tribunal interpreted the term "concerned" to mean the Commissionerate issuing the show cause notice, making the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of that Commissionerate the relevant party to the case. - The Tribunal found that there was no restriction on impleading more than one respondent in appeals filed, especially in cases involving multiple jurisdictions.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Impleading of the Jurisdictional Commissioner as another ...

Case Laws Customs

March 11, 2024

You may also like:

Dishonor of Cheque - signatories of the defaulted cheque - Liability of Chairman / Managing Director - Having done that there was no liberty available to the complainant...

Dishonor of Cheque - cheque issued by a proprietorship firm - Proceedings againt the individual / proprietor - There was no requirement to implead his sole proprietary...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of assessments made u/s 153C, considering the gap between the satisfaction note recorded by the Assessing Officer...

Valuation of goods transacted between related persons - Royalty addition - The Appellate Tribunal scrutinized the jurisdictional implications and competence of the...

Validity of order passed u/s. 147 against deceased assessee - Citing Section 159(2) of the Act and judicial precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that no order can be...

Condonation of delay in filing this Anti-Dumping Appeal - The appellant concealed material relevant facts from the Tribunal since the appellant has not stated that four...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of a re-assessment notice issued by the jurisdictional AO instead of the designated Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) as...

Supremacy of decision division bench of a non-jurisdictional High Court and a single judge bench of a non-jurisdictional High Court - judicial hierarchy - Applicability...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - notice under section 148 has been issued by a non jurisdictional AO - It is settled principle of law that when the notice under section...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - When the issue is a jurisdictional one, the provisions of Section 292BB of the Act cannot cure jurisdictional error. On perusal of the...

Clarification on Jurisdictional RA/RA concerned for SEIS-Para 3.06 (c) of Handbook of Procedures

Maintenance of Proper Accounts and furnishing thereof - the requirement of duly verified and certified by the jurisdictional Excise Authority modified - now this power...

The Appellate Tribunal considered two main issues: 1. Addition u/s 37(1) - Assessee incurred business loss due to default in property payment, allowed as revenue loss. 2....

Revision u/s 263 - issue of shares at premium - The Tribunal affirmed the PCIT's findings regarding the inadequacy of the AO's examination of the valuation of CCDs. It...

Rejection of application for rectification of mistake - Applicability of extended period of limitation - Tribunal did not consider the issue sought to rectified - Maybe,...

Quick Updates: