The ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal, holding that penalty under ...

Penalty Under Section 271G Cannot Be Imposed Without Prior Notice Under Section 92D(3) For Transfer Pricing Documentation

March 10, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal, holding that penalty under s.271G for failure to furnish transfer pricing documentation cannot be levied against the German resident taxpayer. The Tribunal relied on the Procter & Gamble Home Products precedent, which established that s.271G penalties require specific defects to be identified in the documents submitted under s.92D. Since no notice under s.92D(3) was issued requiring the taxpayer to furnish information regarding its international transactions-a prerequisite for initiating s.271G penalty proceedings-the ITAT concluded that the penalty was improperly imposed and upheld the taxpayer's position.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal, holding that penalty under ...

Penalty Under Section 271G Cannot Be Imposed Without Prior Notice Under Section 92D(3) For Transfer Pricing Documentation

March 10, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner having jurisdiction over transfer pricing matters has been empowered, effective April 1, 2022, to invoke revisionary action...

ITAT addressed transfer pricing adjustment regarding business support services between associated enterprises. TPO rejected assessee's TNMM method and entity-level...

The ITAT held that the Transfer Pricing Officer's order was barred by limitation as it was not passed within 60 days from the date of the final assessment order as...

CENVAT Credit - transfer of unutilized credit, on shifting of factory - Transfer of unutilized credit also denied on the ground that appellants have shifted on inputs...

Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments - Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments - debar of deduction u/s 10A on addition income assessed u/s 92CD as per the Proviso to 92C(4) -...

If the Transfer Pricing Officer did not agree to the arm's length price shown by the assessee it was open for him to determine the arm's length price by applying one of...

Transfer Pricing Adjustments - Validity of the order passed u/s. 92CA(3) - period of limitation - 60 days have to be counted prior to the date of last date of limitation...

The Appellate Tribunal examined Transfer Pricing Adjustment disallowing cost of support services. The cost allocation key based on 'headcount' was accepted by the...

Transfer of capital goods to sister unit (transfer of business) - Rule 3 (5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - The conditionalities of Rule 10 given in sub-rule (3)...

E-commerce business - Selling at a price lower than the cost price - unless certain provisions such as Section 145(3)are invoked, the AO is not empowered to go beyond...

Transfer pricing officer (TPO) erred by considering non-associated enterprise (non-AE) revenue and costs while computing transfer pricing (TP) adjustment, contrary to...

Transfer pricing adjustments - Arm’s Length Price - The arbitrary selection of comparables has in fact inflated the operating profit in the computation made by the...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled as follows: Transfer pricing adjustment u/s 92CA(3) for determining arm's length price on interest paid to a related party was...

The appellant was found guilty of bid rigging and cartelization in a tender process initiated by SBIIMS, contravening Sections 3(3)(c), 3(3)(d), and 3(1) of the...

Merger of Forms IEPF-3 with IEPF-4 and IEPF-7 with IEPF-1 along with change in payment process in MCA Version 3. To ease compliance burden and simplify filings, Form...

Quick Updates: