Waiver of pre-deposit - dismissing the appeal for non-compliance ...

Appeal Dismissed for Non-Compliance: Mandatory Pre-Deposit Requirement Upheld, CESTAT Justified in Rejecting Appeals.

March 15, 2024

Case Laws Customs HC

Waiver of pre-deposit - dismissing the appeal for non-compliance of the deposit order - Unless Section 129E is complied with, the Appellate Authority cannot proceed to hear the appeal on merits. - Considering the facts, the court found that the appellants did not comply with the pre-deposit order despite dismissal of their waiver applications and rejection of their writ petitions. Consequently, the CESTAT was justified in dismissing the appeals for non-compliance.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Waiver of pre-deposit - dismissing the appeal for non-compliance ...

Appeal Dismissed for Non-Compliance: Mandatory Pre-Deposit Requirement Upheld, CESTAT Justified in Rejecting Appeals.

March 15, 2024

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

Waiver of pre-deposit - requirement u/s 129E - The case revolved around the appellant's failure to fulfill the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under section 129E of...

Maintainability of appeal - non-compliance with the statutory pre-deposit -The Customs Act does not provide for waiver of this mandatory deposit before filing appeal. -...

Pre-deposit is a mandatory requirement for admission of appeal and not for its dismissal after the appeal has been admitted, heard and taken up for orders - the...

Restoration of the statutory appeal - The CESTAT had dismissed the appeal due to the petitioner's non-representation at a hearing and the failure to inform about...

Dismissal of appeal - alleged defect, for non-compliance of mandatory pre-deposit in terms of Section 129E of the Customs Act - the appeals filed by them have been...

Restoration of appeal - failure to comply with the requirement of pre-deposit prescribed in section 35F - There is no justification for restoration of the appeal that...

Non-Compliance of Pre-deposit - time limitation - Appellate Authority could not have dismissed the appeal on the ground that the prescribed mandatory appeal was made...

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to non-compliance with the statutory requirement of making the pre-deposit. After an amendment on August 6, 2014, neither the...

The appellant's application seeking attachment of a flat in lieu of the mandatory pre-deposit u/s 43(5) of the RERA was dismissed. The court held that the appellant...

Maintainability of appeal - pre-deposit of the amount of certain percentage of duty demanded or penalty imposed - Perusal of section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944...

Non-compliance of pre-deposit order - dismissing the appeal for non compliance of the predeposit order cannot be faulted - HC

HC set aside the dismissal order regarding petitioner's appeal, which was initially rejected due to non-payment of mandatory pre-deposit. The court found procedural...

The order dismissing the appeal due to non-payment of the mandatory pre-deposit amount u/s 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was challenged. The court relied on a...

Maintainability of appeal - requirement of mandatory pre-deposit - after 6.8.2014 neither the Tribunal nor the Commissioner (Appeals) have the power to waive the...

The High Court addressed the dismissal of a restoration application for appeal u/s 112(a) and (b) of the Customs Act, 1962, focusing on compliance with mandatory...

Quick Updates: