Maintainability of appeal against Scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) ...

Appeal Dismissed: ITAT Rules Cause of Action Arises from Intimation, Not Scrutiny Assessment in Tax Case.

March 16, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Maintainability of appeal against Scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) or intimation u/s 143(1) - Cause of action - The ITAT notes that the assessment under section 143(3) solely relies on adjustments made in the intimation under section 143(1), with no independent discussion on the assessed income. - However, it is established that the cause of action for the appeal arises from the intimation under section 143(1), and no cause of action arises from the order passed under section 143(3) of the Act. - Ultimately, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Maintainability of appeal against Scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) ...

Appeal Dismissed: ITAT Rules Cause of Action Arises from Intimation, Not Scrutiny Assessment in Tax Case.

March 16, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Demand of additional tax on simple processing of income - Applicability of provision of Section 143(1A) where assessment may have been completed u/s 143(3) - The High...

Territorial jurisdiction - the place where the cause of action having arisen - since the agreement was executed at Faridabad, part of the cause of action would arise at...

The ITAT Delhi held that the merger of intimation/proceedings u/s 143(1) with regular assessment u/s 143(3) results in the intimation losing relevance once regular...

The assessment u/s 143(1) was invalid as the procedure laid down u/s 144B was not followed. The case was selected for regular assessment, but the assessee was not given...

Maintainability of Appeal against an intimation/processing of return u/s. 143(1) - Merger of intimation order u/s 143(1) with scrutiny order u/s 143(3) - Once the appeal...

Scope of the Adjustment made by the CPC u/s 143(1) when scrutiny assessment made u/s 143(3) - Considering the facts that the case of the assessee was subsequently taken...

Delay of 1154 days in filing appeal before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was not condoned as reasons given, such as leaving income tax matters in hands of...

Validity of Show Cause Notice - SCN issued straight away, without issuing a prior intimation under Rule 142 (1A) - It is a trite law that whenever any ambiguity arises...

Conduct of Assessment Proceedings electronically in time-barring scrutiny cases - Order u/s 119

The case involved the scope of limited scrutiny and the validity of a notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny to...

Condonation of delay of 10 years in filing the present appeal. - despite the cause of action having arisen after passing of the impugned order by learned CIT(A) and...

Conversion of “Limited Scrutiny” into “Complete Scrutiny” - Expanding the scope of limited scrutiny assessment without necessary approval - Since the notice under...

Conversion of limited scrutiny into complete scrutiny assessment - AO has not referred to any credible or reliable material or information to form the view that there...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the issue of merger of intimation u/s 143(1) and scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The case...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of a scrutiny assessment conducted by an Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Addl. CIT) under section 143(3) read with...

Quick Updates: