The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the issue of ...

Tax issues: Merger of intimation u/s 143(1) and scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) not applicable, different disallowances.

Case Laws Income Tax

September 23, 2024

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the issue of merger of intimation u/s 143(1) and scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The case involved an assessment u/s 143(3) where additions were made and refund was determined, subsequent to the issuance of notice u/s 143(2). However, the assessee's revised return was processed u/s 143(1) on the same day as the assessment order u/s 143(3). The ITAT held that the principle of merger is not applicable as the disallowances made u/s 143(1) and Section 143(3) were different. The ITAT analyzed the provisions of Section 143(1D) and Section 241A, concluding that once a notice u/s 143(2) is issued, the Assessing Officer shall not process the return u/s 143(1). Consequently, the ITAT ruled that the intimation passed u/s 143(1)(a) was bad in law and allowed the assessee's appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the issue of ...

Tax issues: Merger of intimation u/s 143(1) and scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) not applicable, different disallowances.

Case Laws Income Tax

September 23, 2024

You may also like:

The ITAT Delhi held that the merger of intimation/proceedings u/s 143(1) with regular assessment u/s 143(3) results in the intimation losing relevance once regular...

The assessment u/s 143(1) was invalid as the procedure laid down u/s 144B was not followed. The case was selected for regular assessment, but the assessee was not given...

Maintainability of Appeal against an intimation/processing of return u/s. 143(1) - Merger of intimation order u/s 143(1) with scrutiny order u/s 143(3) - Once the appeal...

Validity of Assessment order passed u/s 143(3) - scrutiny assessment - period of limitation specified u/s 153(1) - assessment order framed by the Assessing Officer is in...

Validity of adjustments made in an intimation u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, where there was a mismatch between the income tax return and the tax audit report filed...

Adjustment in the intimation specified u/s 143(1) - debatable issues - benefit of accumulation - deemed income u/s Section 11(3) - the issues which are of debatable...

Reassessment u/s 147 – the expression “reason to believe“ cannot have two different standards or sets of meaning, one applicable where the assessment was earlier made...

Disallowance made by the CPC in an intimation issued u/s. 143(1) denying the exemption claimed u/s. 11 - where a claim has been made which requires further inquiry, it...

Scrutiny/ regular assessment u/s 143(3) - validity of notice issued u/s 143(2) - Belated claim of refund with interest by making application u/s 119(1)(b)(c) - There is...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153(1) - Period of limitation - In this case, since, the Assessing Officer cannot invoke jurisdiction u/s.144C(1) and pass draft...

Seeking refund with interest on the basis of Income Tax Returns (ITR) - Withholding of refund u/s 241A - scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) is pending - an intimation under...

Merely because intimation u/s 143(1) was issued to the assessee after issue of notice u/s 143(2), it cannot be said that an assessment order framed by the AO u/s 143(3)...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 - failure to issue notice u/s 143(2) - reopening of assessment is not valid as the Income Tax Department has power to conduct the...

The ITAT upheld the validity of adjustments made in the intimation u/s 143(1) regarding the addition of payment of employees' contribution to PF and ESIC beyond the due...

Conversion of “Limited Scrutiny” into “Complete Scrutiny” - Expanding the scope of limited scrutiny assessment without necessary approval - Since the notice under...

Quick Updates: