The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the issue of ...

Tribunal Rules Processing Revised Tax Return Invalid Post-Notice, Disallowances Differ u/ss 143(1) & 143(3.

September 23, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the issue of merger of intimation u/s 143(1) and scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The case involved an assessment u/s 143(3) where additions were made and refund was determined, subsequent to the issuance of notice u/s 143(2). However, the assessee's revised return was processed u/s 143(1) on the same day as the assessment order u/s 143(3). The ITAT held that the principle of merger is not applicable as the disallowances made u/s 143(1) and Section 143(3) were different. The ITAT analyzed the provisions of Section 143(1D) and Section 241A, concluding that once a notice u/s 143(2) is issued, the Assessing Officer shall not process the return u/s 143(1). Consequently, the ITAT ruled that the intimation passed u/s 143(1)(a) was bad in law and allowed the assessee's appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the issue of ...

Tribunal Rules Processing Revised Tax Return Invalid Post-Notice, Disallowances Differ u/ss 143(1) & 143(3.

September 23, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Validity of manual revised returns filed - scheme of demerger approved - scheme of arrangement approved by NCLT required Petitioner and Hind Lamps to file revised...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the revised return of income filed by the assessee cannot be treated as invalid by the Assessing Officer (AO). Since the AO...

Processing of invalid return u/s 143(1) - Denial of exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - non-filing of ITR-V within 120 days made the assessee’s return as ‘invalid’ being...

When the AO rejects the revised return then the whole return is invalid. In case AO makes addition from the revised return then it means that he recognizes the revised...

Filing of revised return - time limit for filing of revised return - Rule 7B of Service Tax Rules-1994 - the revenue authorities have failed to consider the aspect of...

The taxpayer filed an original return which was processed by the CPC. Subsequently, a revised return was filed u/s 139(5) with a self-assessment tax of Rs. 10,820/-....

Filing of e-return by Legal Heir (LH) using DSC: Revised Process.

The ITAT Pune dealt with a case involving denial of standard deduction and Chapter VIA deductions u/s 80C. The appellant, an individual earning income under the head...

The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

Validity of revised return 139(5) - Revised return did not conform to the prescription of section 139(5), before its substitution w.e.f. A.Y. 2017-18, which provided for...

The ITAT held that the limitation period for issuing a notice u/s 143(2) is relevant to the financial year and assessment year. When the Assessing Officer considered the...

Addition of amount shown in revised return under the pressure of the department - revised return should relate back to the return originally filed, minus the omissions...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 against intimation u/s. 143(1) - Rejection on the ground that, revised return was not authenticated - The ITAT recognize the mistake in...

Petitioner cannot evade penalty u/s 22(5) of TNVAT Act, 2006 by paying tax after inspection but before assessment order. Rule 7(9) of TNVAT Rules, 2007 prohibits filing...

Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made thereunder - revised return treated as non-est - the appellant filed his original return otherwise than u/s 139(1)...

Quick Updates: