Levy of penalty - Search and seizure operation at the ...

Court Rules Section 129(3) Misapplied in Godown Search; Calls for Administrative Review and Officer Accountability.

March 18, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Levy of penalty - Search and seizure operation at the petitioner's godown. - The Court held that invoking Section 129(3) in this instance was without jurisdiction. The provision, intended for regulating goods in transit, was misapplied to a stationary godown, a static location not covered under the said section's purview. This misapplication highlighted a significant procedural misstep, as the actions undertaken by the officers exceeded their jurisdictional boundaries set by the Act. - The Court criticized this deliberate mischaracterization, refraining from delving into the motives behind such conduct to avoid a lengthy process. However, it emphasized the accountability of the officers, recommending administrative review and appropriate disciplinary action.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty - Search and seizure operation at the ...

Court Rules Section 129(3) Misapplied in Godown Search; Calls for Administrative Review and Officer Accountability.

March 18, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

In the matter under review, the High Court dismissed the review petitions filed by the parties. The Court held that no grounds were established for seeking a review of...

The High Court considered the maintainability of a review petition based on a subsequent judgment and the condonation of a 619-day delay in filing the civil review...

Assessment u/s 153C versus 143 - Additions u/s 45 - Underreporting of sale consideration for immovable property while framing the Assessment Order u/s 143(3) - Whether...

Assistance to authorized officer during search and seizure - For the purpose of search AO now take services of any person, entity as approved by PCC or CC or PDGIT or...

The review petition challenges the order imposing interest liability over the withheld amount and cost on the Managing Director. The court held that reviewing an order...

The High Court held that the Assessing Officer cannot reopen the assessment u/s 147 merely based on a change of opinion. The assessee had fully and truly disclosed all...

HC affirmed ED's authority to conduct search, seizure, and account freezing operations under FEMA 1999 and PMLA 2002. Court held that interference during investigation...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153(1) - Period of limitation - In this case, since, the Assessing Officer cannot invoke jurisdiction u/s.144C(1) and pass draft...

Levy of penalty - when the petitioner is not entitled to claim concessional rate of tax under section 3% of the TNGST Act, they are liable to pay penalty under section...

Assessment u/s 153A - Addition u/s 69A by the Assessing Officer on account of difference in amount credited in bank and sale proceeds shown in the income tax return. It...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

A review application is maintainable on (i) discovery of new and important evidence which could not be produced earlier despite due diligence, (ii) mistake or error...

Search and Seizure - failure in filing regular monthly returns/statements - consignment of taxable goods transported by it - The respondent no. 5 is a competent officer...

The High Court addressed penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 following premises search. Relying on precedent, the Court held that...

Rejection of declaration for Tax Relief under the provisions of Sabka Vikas [Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - mistake apparent on record or sufficient reasons...

Quick Updates: