Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2024 Year 2024 This

Addition u/s 69 - addition based on the estimation of the cost ...


Tribunal Rejects Income Addition Due to Lack of Evidence for Estimated Property Acquisition Cost.

March 23, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Addition u/s 69 - addition based on the estimation of the cost of acquisition of the property - The ITAT observed that the AO had relied heavily on statements obtained during the survey proceedings, particularly regarding the payment of on-money for the property purchase. However, the Tribunal emphasized that such statements, which were later retracted, could not constitute valid evidence for making additions to the appellant's income. Furthermore, the Tribunal noted that the AO had not provided any supporting material apart from these statements to justify the addition. Considering these factors, the Tribunal held that the AO's decision to estimate the property acquisition cost at a higher value lacked sufficient basis and was not supported by credible evidence.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Addition of contract receipts - bogus activity - Estimation of income - The AO had made an addition to the assessee's income, alleging discrepancies in the contract...

  2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal examined the determination of net profits from contract business, rejection of books of accounts, and addition u/s 40(a)(ia) for...

  3. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to reject the assessee's books of accounts under section 145 and estimate income under section 144. The Tribunal clarified that...

  4. Addition u/s 68 OR 41(1) - unexplained cash credit - Cessation of liability - The appellant contested additions to their income, alleging bogus sundry creditors. Despite...

  5. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 due to the assessee providing bogus accommodation loss entries. The AO had reasons to believe in the...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

  7. The Appellate Tribunal held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on estimated additions due to bogus purchases from hawala dealers was unjustified as the assessee failed to...

  8. Assessment u/s 153A - computation of income from house property. Additions proposed relate to unabated assessment years from 2013-14 onwards where no incriminating...

  9. The assessee denied the entries representing unaccounted cash expenditure, stating they were merely MIS reports for discussion purposes, containing approximate project...

  10. The ITAT Jodhpur allowed admission of additional evidence u/r 46A of IT Rules by CIT(A) to delete addition on merits. The tribunal found merit in the evidence provided...

  11. Assessee's unaccounted sales were estimated based on notebooks, diaries, and WhatsApp conversations. Only real income can be taxed. While unaccounted sales existed,...

  12. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order rejecting the assessee's books of accounts and estimating total income. When books are rejected u/s 145 and income estimated u/s 144,...

  13. The Tribunal held that based on the financial parameters and risk profile, the assessee qualifies as a developer rather than merely a contractor u/s 80IA of the Income...

  14. The Appellate Tribunal considered two main issues: 1. Addition u/s 37(1) - Assessee incurred business loss due to default in property payment, allowed as revenue loss. 2....

  15. The assessee, a company engaged in development/construction and sale of flats and plots, had classified its properties into four categories: flats open for sale, let-out...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates