Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

The assessee, a company engaged in development/construction and ...


Tribunal Upholds Property Classification, Orders Fresh Review on PF/ESI, Allows Section 43CA Addition, Windmill Deductions.

August 17, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The assessee, a company engaged in development/construction and sale of flats and plots, had classified its properties into four categories: flats open for sale, let-out flats, self-occupied flats, and flats under litigation. The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of let-out properties from Annual Lettable Value (ALV) calculation, following its earlier orders. For properties under litigation, the issue was restored to the Assessing Officer to examine evidence for non-inclusion of ALV. For self-occupied properties, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to exclude ALV, as per Section 22 of the Act. Regarding windmill income, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow deduction for expenses incurred during the first three months, corresponding to the income taxed for that period. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s findings on slump sale and revenue clause. On basement ALV, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s estimation of 50% ALV due to restricted usage. The issue of disallowance of employees' PF/ESI contribution was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal allowed the revenue's ground on addition u/s 43CA, as the assessee did not contest it.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Employees contribution received from its employees towards PF/ESI - deposited with PF/ESI authorities beyond the time stipulated under the relevant PF/ESI Act but were...

  2. Review of Order after gap of 13 years - delay can be condoned or not - There is a period of one year provided as per the Act, 2003 for seeking review of any order passed...

  3. Attachment of immovable properties ordered by PF organization - priority over the dues - Secured creditors (Banks) or PF organization - PF organization was within its...

  4. The Appellate Tribunal addressed several key issues. Firstly, on Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment, it found errors in the CIT(A)'s decision as rectification was only...

  5. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - inadequate v/s no enquiry - unsecured loan, difference in stock and late payment of PF & ESI - The Tribunal reviewed each of the contested...

  6. Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order...

  7. Validity of order of tribunal in Review Appeal - Denial of benefit which was allowed earlier - Power to Review - Therefore, this Court holds that the Review by the...

  8. Disallowance of late payment of employees contribution to PF/ESI - If the amount is deposited before the due date of filing of return of income u/s 139(1) of the 1961...

  9. Validity of fresh assessment orders - HC quashed the assessment order invoking the writ jurisdiction - othing has been observed by the High Court on the merits of the...

  10. Power of tribunal to review application - It is the well laid down proposition of law that ‘in the absence of any power of ‘Review’ or ‘Recall’ vested with the...

  11. Addition in respect of employees contribution to ESI & PF - delayed deposits of contributions - addition by way of adjustment while processing the return of income u/s...

  12. Employees contribution towards PF and ESI deducted by assessee from salaries of employees which is deposited by assessee beyond the due date prescribed under relevant...

  13. Additions towards Employees contribution on account of PF & ESI delayed payment - Assessee company is not entitled for deduction u/s 36(1)(va) claimed on account of...

  14. Delayed deposit of PF/ESI - disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) r.w.s 2(24) (x) - same has to be deposited with the Government within fifteen days of the close of every month and...

  15. Review petition - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Tribunal sustaining the levy without providing an opportunity of hearing - Review applicant had paid entire tax amount...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates