Penalty levied u/s 271DA - The Addl. CIT observed that the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

April 4, 2024

Penalty levied u/s 271DA - The Addl. CIT observed that the assessee had violated Section 269ST by splitting invoices for cash receipts of Rs. 2,00,000 or more from a single person. - The Appellate Tribunal noted that the items purchased were marriage dresses and different in nature. - Section 271DA prescribes penalties for contraventions of Section 269ST. The legislative intention behind the introduction of Section 269ST was to discourage cash transactions and promote digital economy. The Tribunal referred to judicial precedents, emphasizing that penalties may not be imposed for technical or venial breaches of the Act. It considered the definitions of 'good cause' and 'sufficient cause,' as well as relevant case laws to determine the applicability of penalties. - The Tribunal concluded that no penalty was leviable.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty levied u/s 271DA - The Addl. CIT observed that the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

April 4, 2024

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalty was initiated u/s. 271DA instead of u/s. 271D, which led to confusion and violated the assessee's right to a fair hearing....

Penalty u/s. 271DA - deposit of cash in the bank account of the assessee, directly by the party, at a different location - Considering the nature of business of the...

Levy of penalty u/s. 221 - default the payment of TDS to the government - assessee in default - the Assessing Officer levied penalty at very exorbitant rate that 5% pm...

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

The assessee was levied penalty u/s 271B for delay in filing the audit report u/s 44AB within the stipulated time. The assessee contended that the invoices and other...

Levy of penalty on dealers who issues Bogus Invoices - Cenvat Credit - Bogus credit - levy of penalty confirmed, though reduced - AT

The case involved the determination of penalty u/s 69(1)(k) of the J&K Value Added Tax Act, 2005 for the issuance of 35 improper invoices on the same day. The High Court...

Penalty for false invoice - Section 55(2) AP VAT Act states that any VAT dealer, who issues a false tax invoice or receives and uses a tax invoice, knowing it to be...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Levy of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - penalty has been levied on the amount of undisclosed income without providing any working of maximum and minimum penalty leviable - No penalty - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 129(5) of GST Act for discrepancy between PIN code of petitioner in Tax Invoices and E-Way Bill. Court held minor discrepancy in PIN code in GST...

Levy of penalty - Profiteering - purchase of flat - It is apparent from the perusal of Section 122 (1) (i) that the violation of the provisions of Section 171 (1) is not...

Benefit of Amnesty Scheme - Penalty levied u/s 271D and 271E - When a specified sum is so provided as the penalty, such specified sum is the minimum penalty payable....

Penalty - issuance of sale invoice instead of tax invoice by seller - assessee was required to disclose the Tin Number and other details to the selling dealer and to...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Quick Updates: