Revision u/s 263 - The PCIT primarily questioned the claim of ...

Tax Tribunal Upholds Deduction, Rejects PCIT's Claims of Inadequate Review by Assessing Officer u/s 80IC.

April 4, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 - The PCIT primarily questioned the claim of deduction under Section 80IC and criticized the AO for allegedly not conducting a thorough examination during the assessment proceedings. However, upon review, the Appellate Tribunal (AT) found that the AO had diligently examined the matter and that the Assessee had provided necessary information and documents to justify the deduction claimed under Section 80IC. The AT concluded that the PCIT's assertions lacked merit and overturned the decision, emphasizing the importance of considering all relevant information before deeming an assessment order as erroneous.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - The PCIT primarily questioned the claim of ...

Tax Tribunal Upholds Deduction, Rejects PCIT's Claims of Inadequate Review by Assessing Officer u/s 80IC.

April 4, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return...

The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving a revision u/s 263 related to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The AO allowed interest income from FD investments as a...

The assessee claimed exemption/deduction u/s 54F on account of investing long-term capital gains in a new residential house. The PCIT disallowed the claim, considering...

The assessee was allowed deduction u/s 54/54F without proper examination of relevant details and materials. The Assessing Officer (AO) framed the assessment u/s 143(3)...

The assessee, a company engaged in development/construction and sale of flats and plots, had classified its properties into four categories: flats open for sale, let-out...

The ITAT held that the order passed u/s 263 by the PCIT was in gross violation of the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal observed that the order disregarded the...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the validity of a revision u/s 263, focusing on the alleged non-consideration of the assessee's submissions by the Principal...

The ITAT held that where the assessee entered into a unilateral Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and complied with its...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed a case involving revision u/s 263 by PCIT questioning the recognition of liabilities 'Nardana Claim-1' and 'Nardana Claim-2' under ICDS....

The ITAT allowed the deduction claimed u/s 80G for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenditure. The solitary reason for denying the deduction by the lower...

The assessee delayed filing the TDS statement, leading to late fees u/s 234E. The Assessing Officer issued an order u/s 200A regarding the late filing. The assessee...

Revision u/s 263 regarding claim of accommodation entry - reliance on statements of third parties. Timelines for completing assessment u/s 143(3). Assessing officer duly...

CIT(A) restricted addition on account of accommodation entries to 15% instead of 100%, as the Assessing Officer failed to establish that work was not actually performed....

Denial of deduction claimed under Chapter VI-A i.e. Section 80G/ 80GGA read with Section 35AC - The Appellate Tribunal noted that the appellant had not claimed the...

The assessee borrowed loans from financial institutions at an interest rate of 12.75% and advanced loans to group companies or relatives at 12% interest rate. The...

Quick Updates: