Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2024 Year 2024 This

Deemed income u/s 56(2)(x) - Defective Show cause notice - ...


Court Invalidates Tax Notice for Lack of Clarity on Deemed Income and Investment, Ensures Fair Response Opportunity.

April 24, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Deemed income u/s 56(2)(x) - Defective Show cause notice - Addition of Unexplained investment u/s 69 - charged to tax u/s 115BBE - The High Court found that the show cause notice issued to the petitioner was defective as it did not specify whether the stamp duty value was proposed to be treated under Section 56(2)(x)(a) or Section 56(2)(x)(b) of the Act. This lack of specificity deprived the petitioner of a reasonable opportunity to respond effectively. Additionally, the assessment order failed to mention Section 56(2)(x) of the Act in its operative part, indicating a deviation from the grounds stated in the show cause notice. The court emphasized that the issuance of a show cause notice is not an empty formality and serves the purpose of providing a fair opportunity to the affected party.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Reopening of assessment against entity ceased to exist/amalgamating entity - The court observed that the Revenue had not considered the income tax return filed by the...

  2. ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

  3. The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

  4. Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

  5. The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

  6. The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

  7. Charitable institution invested funds in shares of joint venture companies, violating Section 13(1)(d). Exemption u/s 11 denied for income from such investment. However,...

  8. The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

  9. Method of communication of notice - The High Court examined the provisions of Section 282(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 127(1) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962...

  10. The HC upheld the transfer order under s.127 of the Income Tax Act, finding no grounds to interfere with the transfer of assessment from Income Tax Officer, Theni to...

  11. This judgment deals with the validity of reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act between July and September 2022, in light of the Tax Ordinance and the...

  12. Cancellation of GST Registration - Legal Validity of Retrospective Cancellation - The court acknowledged the lack of clarity in the show cause notice and the absence of...

  13. The court held that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue the impugned notices u/s 148, particularly in view of the provisions of...

  14. Money Laundering - Scheduled offences - whether the Non-Bailable Warrants (NBW) issued against the petitioner are liable to be quashed? - The High Court affirmed the...

  15. Validity of the Order-in-Original - Adjudication of show cause notice - The petitioner argued that they were not given a fair opportunity to present their case and...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates