Levy of penalty - goods were undervalued - The High Court, after ...

Case Laws GST

April 29, 2024

Levy of penalty - goods were undervalued - The High Court, after careful consideration of legal precedents and statutory provisions, ruled in favor of the petitioner. It held that detaining goods based solely on valuation discrepancies does not warrant penalty imposition under Section 129 of the Act. The court emphasized adherence to proper procedures outlined in Sections 73 or 74 of the Act for cases involving under-valuation. Consequently, the impugned orders were quashed, and any deposits made by the petitioner were ordered to be returned.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty - goods were undervalued - The High Court, after ...

Case Laws GST

April 29, 2024

You may also like:

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS was challenged. ITAT held that where assessee received sale consideration for immovable property in cash exceeding Rs....

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on an employee of the Customs Broker - classification of imported goods - The commissioner has recorded as finding...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

Levy of penalty u/s. 221 - default the payment of TDS to the government - assessee in default - the Assessing Officer levied penalty at very exorbitant rate that 5% pm...

Penalty proceedings for a default committed by a deceased - legal representatives - Levy of penalty u/s 271B for non-furnishing of Tax Audit Report within the prescribed...

Levy of penalty u/s 114 - The discretion of levying penalty is always available with the Statutory Authority under Section 114, whenever such an Authority is of the view...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - An order in the name of dead person - The Appellate Tribunal acknowledged that the penalty order was indeed issued in the name of a deceased...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The appellant contended that the addition made by the Assessing Officer was based solely on estimations, making it ineligible for...

The assessee challenged the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for short credit of sale consideration received from the sale of copyrights and cable rights. The issue...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Levy of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - penalty has been levied on the amount of undisclosed income without providing any working of maximum and minimum penalty leviable - No penalty - AT

Assessment proceedings against one of the legal heirs - deceased/assessee had admittedly more than one legal representatives - Despite the legal heir's explicit...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271B for failure to get accounts audited u/s 44AB - The ITAT held that once a penalty has been levied under Section 271A for non-maintenance of...

Quick Updates: