Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2022 Year 2022 This

Interest liability - delay in furnishing GSTR-3B return - ...


Court Quashes Demand for Interest on Delayed GSTR-3B; Revenue Must Follow Adjudication Process Under CGST Act Sections 73/74.

February 24, 2022

Case Laws     GST     HC

Interest liability - delay in furnishing GSTR-3B return - Liability imposed without any adjudication proceeding u/s 73 or 74 - despite disputing the liability towards interest, the revenue has raised a demand for payment of interest on the ground of delay in furnishing of GSTR-3B return for the period July 2017 to December 2019 without initiating any adjudication proceedings under Section 73 or 74 of the CGST Act, 2017. Earlier by an order dated 8th May 2020 a Coordinate Bench of this Court had been pleased to grant interim protection from any coercive steps against the petitioner pursuant to the impugned demand at Annexure-4. - Demand quashed with liberty - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Demand of GST - Discrepancy between the GSTR-3B returns and the auto populated GSTR-2A returns - The court observed that the tax demand solely pertained to the disparity...

  2. HC held that six show cause notices (SCN) issued between 2004-2011 were quashed due to violation of natural justice principles, stemming from inordinate and unexplained...

  3. Inordinate delay in adjudication of show cause notice by revenue authorities constitutes breach of fair procedure and violates principles of natural justice, causing...

  4. The High Court set aside the impugned tax demand order due to violation of principles of natural justice, as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to...

  5. The court held that the petitioner was denied the principles of natural justice by not being given a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits regarding...

  6. One-day delay in filing GSTR-3B for September 2020 led to reversal of ITC. Petitioner filed GSTR-3B on 23.10.2020, one day late. Respondent issued Form GST DRC-01A on 22....

  7. The High Court quashed the show cause notices and orders issued by the revenue authorities due to inordinate delay ranging from 9 to 20 years in adjudicating the...

  8. Validity of assessment order - mismatch between the GSTR 3B returns filed by the petitioner and the auto-populated GSTR 2A returns - The High court acknowledged the...

  9. HC held that adjudicating authority must consider GSTR-9 annual returns when evaluating Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims, rather than solely relying on discrepancies...

  10. The court held that the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the department due to discrepancy between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A violated principles of natural...

  11. Validity Of Order - Tax demand based on Audit observations - variation between the GSTR 3B return and Form 26AS - The High Court observed that there could be duplication...

  12. The High Court considered a challenge to an assessment order based on disparity between the petitioner's GSTR 3B return and the supplier's GSTR 1 return. The...

  13. The High Court considered the validity of a garnishee order due to a mismatch between the supplier's GSTR 1 statement and the petitioner's GSTR 3B returns. The court...

  14. Interest payable on delayed payment of taxes - section 50 read with section 75(12) of JGST Act - The Respondents have failed to follow the procedure prescribed in law...

  15. HC quashed Show Cause Notice dated June 20, 2012 and Order-in-Original dated March 26, 2024 due to inordinate delay in adjudication. The court rejected Customs...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates