Validity of reopening of assessment - Petitioner received ...

Court Quashes Income Assessment Due to Unclear Notice and Lack of Due Diligence by Tax Authorities.

May 2, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Validity of reopening of assessment - Petitioner received another notice u/s 148A(b) once again, alleging escapement of income - The High Court quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 24th March 2023, along with the order passed under Section 148 of the Act. The High Noted that the second notice lacked clarity and failed to explain how there was any escapement of income. Additionally, the assessment order based on this notice was passed without proper consideration of crucial information. The assessment order was flawed as it did not refer to certain crucial information and indicated a lack of application of mind by the Assessing Officer and the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of reopening of assessment - Petitioner received ...

Court Quashes Income Assessment Due to Unclear Notice and Lack of Due Diligence by Tax Authorities.

May 2, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

Validity of reopening of assessment - The High Court found that the Assessing Officer issued the notice based on the survey action on Jammu & Kashmir Bank, conducted...

The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - validity of order passed u/s 148A(d) - With Regard to the approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, the High Court questions...

Reopening of assessment under old regime - scope of new regime - scope of TOLA - In this detailed judgement, the Court found that the notice issued under Section 148 was...

Income–tax (15th Amendment) Rules, 2016 - Amendments in Due diligence requirement - Notification

The High Court quashed the reopening of assessments u/s 148, holding that the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer were cryptic, vague, lacking nexus, and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Petitioner availed alternate remedy of filing substantive appeal against assessment order and notices issued u/ss 148A and 148 of the Act. Court held that if assessment...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashed the assessment order u/s 144/147 and the demand notice u/s 156, treating them as non-existent due to the failure to mention the...

Reassessment proceedings' validity questioned due to lack of appropriate authority's sanction u/s 151. Legality of jurisdiction, assessment orders, and notices issued...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - second re-assessment notice u/s 148A - The High Court noted that the petitioner did not challenge the earlier re-assessment order dated...

Quick Updates: