Levy of maximum penalty - penalty imposed on the basis of ...

Court Overturns Maximum Penalty Due to Technical Error in E-way Bill, Citing Unintentional Mistake and No Tax Evasion.

May 3, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Levy of maximum penalty - penalty imposed on the basis of technical error - non downloading of E-way Bill-01 - The Allahabad High Court reviewed the matter and set aside the penalty. - The technical error in not downloading the E-way Bill-01 was deemed unintentional. The court relied on Division Bench judgments, particularly citing the case of Harley Foods Products Ltd. This precedent emphasized that penalties should not be imposed when there is no deliberate evasion of tax.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of maximum penalty - penalty imposed on the basis of ...

Court Overturns Maximum Penalty Due to Technical Error in E-way Bill, Citing Unintentional Mistake and No Tax Evasion.

May 3, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Penalty order - wrongful mention of place of supply in E-Way bills - intent to evade tax or not - The High Court noted that the incorrect address mentioned in the E-Way...

The Rajasthan High Court considered a case involving the detention of goods due to an expired e-way bill, raising concerns about tax evasion. Citing a judgment from the...

Levy of Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - Errors in e-way bills - The Court emphasized that minor typographical errors in e-way bills,...

Levy of penalty - goods were unloaded at a place that was not registered in the registration certificate - unloading goods at a location not specified in the e-way bill...

Levy of penalty for violation of section 129 and Rule 138 - Failure to update the E-way bill on change of vehicle after breakdown - The imposition of penalties for mere...

Imposition of tax and penalty u/s 129(3) - e-way bill had expired nine hours and thirty minutes prior to interception - The High court referred to previous cases where...

Petitioner satisfied all requirements to claim benefits under Merchandise Export from India Scheme (MEIS) but failed to declare intent on shipping bills due to...

Penalty order - Part-B of the e-way bill was not filled up - intent to evade tax - The High court, referencing a previous judgment, ruled that such technical errors, in...

Seeking amendment of shipping bills - inadvertent error in the Shipping bills - seeking to credit ROSCTL benefit amounts to the petitioner’s Customs E-Scrip Ledger - The...

Levy of penalty - at the time of detention was that one of the E-Way Bills had expired - The High court held that mens rea to evade tax is essential for imposing...

The High Court considered the legality of a penalty imposed u/s 31(3) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, due to the want of Form 28B. The issue was whether the defendants...

Violation of principles of natural justice - technical glitch - Despite the Department's submission that the petitioner had been informed in advance about the correct...

Levy of penalty - the e-way bill had expired one hour fifteen minutes prior to interception - The High Court acknowledged that while the e-way bill had expired, the...

Levy of penalty - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - existence of mens rea or not The High Court referenced a specific case and highlighted that the issue of...

Levy of tax / penalty - error with regard to the address of the consignee in the E-Way Bill - The High court observes that in numerous judgments, it has been established...

Quick Updates: