Valuation - Export of Carpets and threading bars - ...

Case Laws Customs

May 6, 2024

Valuation - Export of Carpets and threading bars - Mis-declaration of description and value - The Tribunal found that while the carpets were misdeclared and subject to confiscation, the threading bars were not misdeclared. The redetermined value was set aside due to lack of evidence from the department to counter procurement documents provided by the respondent. The reduction of redemption fine and penalty was partially upheld considering the admitted misdeclaration by the respondent.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Valuation - Export of Carpets and threading bars - ...

Case Laws Customs

May 6, 2024

You may also like:

Valuation - Enhancement of value of the imported RPO - CESTAT held that, in the present case neither any contemporaneous value was adopted nor any method as prescribed...

Respondent issued show cause notice alleging import of prohibited goods. Petitioner replied and attended personal hearing. Impugned order did not discuss hazardous waste...

Mis-declaration of imported goods - Mobile Point of Sale (MPOS) Devices - appellant and its director have been found grossly mis-declared on the counts of description,...

Mis-declaration of value of export goods - rejection of valuation - attachment / seizure order - At this stage there being no further material on record, the prohibitory...

Valuation of export goods - export of Iron Ore Fines - the transaction value i.e. FOB price cannot be treated as cum duty price under section 14 of Customs Act, 1962 for...

Export of Carpets - generation of wrong documents, due to defects in software - mis-description of value as well as quantity of goods - The appellant on being pointed...

Levy of penalty on shipping line u/s 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 - mis-declaration of goods in description as well as in quantity in bills of landing - As the fact has...

Mis-declaration of value of imported goods - Since the appellants deliberately suppressed the value by mis-declaring, the goods were liable for confiscation. - AT

Mis-declaration of description of goods – export of non-basmati rice as basmati rice - no leniency can be made to reduce redemption fine - AT

Mis-declaration of quantity - Assorted spectacle - The Tribunal acknowledged the misdeclaration of quantity, confirming that the actual quantity exceeded the declared...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed multiple issues raised in the appeals concerning the classification of Rubber Processing Oil (RPO), enhancement of its imported value,...

Valuation of export goods - rejection of declared value - claim of duty drawback wrongfully - the said concealment was nothing but an afterthought to cover up the...

Valuation of exported goods - iron ore - enhancement of value based on contemporaneous export - provisions of Rule 4 provides for determination of export value by comparison.

Demand of Differential Duty - Inclusion of value of deemed export in the value of DTA clearance of goods - wrongful determination of assessable value of finished goods -...

In the case before CESTAT Bangalore, the issue revolved around mis-declaration of import value, duty demand, confiscation of goods, and penalty imposition. The...

Quick Updates: