Imports Of Marble slabs - Mis-declaration of quantity in the ...

Tribunal Upholds Customs Penalties for Mis-declared Marble Imports; Appellant's Challenge Dismissed for Procedural Missteps.

May 6, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

Imports Of Marble slabs - Mis-declaration of quantity in the declared goods - Considering the appellant's failure to contest the discrepancy during assessment and their request for immediate release without a show cause notice, the Tribunal found them legally estopped from challenging the assessment later. - The Tribunal noted the substantial difference between the declared and measured quantities of marble slabs. Despite the appellant's argument regarding technical expertise, the measurements were conducted using standard methods, and the discrepancy was evident. The Tribunal upheld the customs authorities' decision to invoke relevant sections of the Customs Act and impose penalties. - Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal upheld the assessment and penalties imposed by customs authorities.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imports Of Marble slabs - Mis-declaration of quantity in the ...

Tribunal Upholds Customs Penalties for Mis-declared Marble Imports; Appellant's Challenge Dismissed for Procedural Missteps.

May 6, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Confiscation - fine - penalty - Mis-declaring the quantity of cigarettes imported under warehouse bill of entry for re-export purpose - The customs authorities...

Mis-declaration of quantity - Assorted spectacle - The Tribunal acknowledged the misdeclaration of quantity, confirming that the actual quantity exceeded the declared...

Goods were mis-declared in baggage declaration for export, rendering them liable for confiscation. Penalties imposed under Customs Act: Section 114 on individuals...

Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 (a) and (b) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - Abetment in mis-declaration of goods and evasion of duty - The appellants were accused of being...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on an employee of the Customs Broker - classification of imported goods - The commissioner has recorded as finding...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Allegation of evasion of anti-dumping duty - joint liability with rea-importer - mis-declaring the country of...

Customs authority rejected transaction value declared by importer and enhanced value based on email evidence and statement of partner admitting negotiated higher price....

Smuggling of the gold bars - bona fide baggage - The Tribunal found that the appellant knowingly avoided declaring the gold bars upon arrival, thus violating customs...

The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalties...

Customs broker - Revocation of License - forfeiture of security deposit - Penalty - The Tribunal found that the appellant had indeed acted casually and allowed his...

The penalty imposed u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellant (a Customs Broker) for abetting the clearance of undeclared/mis-declared export goods was...

Customs authority confiscated imported old and used worn clothing for failure to comply with licensing requirements. The Tribunal upheld confiscation u/s 111(d) of...

CESTAT upheld the confiscation of goods and imposition of differential customs duty regarding misclassification of 100% Polyester Knitted Fabric. The appellant...

Levy of penalty - mis-declaration of goods - unflavoured boiled supari - reduction of the penalty under section 112 by the Commissioner (Appeals) - according to Revenue...

Quick Updates: