Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of notice issued u/s ...

Tax Penalty Overturned: Tribunal Finds No Contumacious Conduct in Compliance Case, Citing Supreme Court Precedent.

May 13, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of notice issued u/s 142(1) - Referring to the precedent set by the Supreme Court in Hindustan Steel Ltd. vs. State of Orissa, the Tribunal emphasized that penalties should not be levied if the conduct of the assessee is not contumacious. In this case, the Tribunal found no evidence of contumacious behavior on the part of the appellant.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of notice issued u/s ...

Tax Penalty Overturned: Tribunal Finds No Contumacious Conduct in Compliance Case, Citing Supreme Court Precedent.

May 13, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Revocation of Customs Broker License - Overvaluation and misdeclaration with intent to claim drawback under section 75 of Customs Act, 1962 - The tribunal acknowledged...

Penalty under section 271C - failure to deduct tax on payment made on account of salary - No contumacious conduct can therefore be attributed to the assessee - No penalty - AT

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) due to the Accountant's Covid-19...

The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalty was initiated u/s. 271DA instead of u/s. 271D, which led to confusion and violated the assessee's right to a fair hearing....

Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine and penalty for importing old clothing. Referring to a previous case, it upheld confiscation due to non-compliance but decreased...

Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

Offence u/s 276(C)(2) and 277 - Allegation of willful tax evasion and non-payment of admitted tax - compounding application. The petitioner submitted income tax return...

Levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - Non compliance to the notice(s) issued during the course of assessment proceedings - The ITAT noted that the assessee did respond to...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

Quick Updates: