Penalty order u/s 129(3) - penalty order subsequent to search ...

Court Quashes Unjustified Penalty Orders from Godown Search and Seizure, Rules in Favor of Petitioner.

May 13, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Penalty order u/s 129(3) - penalty order subsequent to search and seizure of the godown - In light of the above precedent and considering the facts of the present case, the High Court finds that the penalty proceedings initiated against the petitioner are not justified. Therefore, the impugned orders are quashed and set aside.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty order u/s 129(3) - penalty order subsequent to search ...

Court Quashes Unjustified Penalty Orders from Godown Search and Seizure, Rules in Favor of Petitioner.

May 13, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The High Court addressed the validity of a seizure order u/s 67(2) of the CGST Act, focusing on whether the term "things" includes cash/currency seized during search and...

The High Court addressed penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 following premises search. Relying on precedent, the Court held that...

The Punjab and Haryana High Court held that undisclosed income found during a search, related to a pawning business, falls within the scope of Section 269SS of the...

Levy of penalty u/s 129 (3) of the GST Act - Allegation that appellant/petitioner did not generate e-Way Bill with a view to evade tax - Despite the petitioner...

Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c) - Income disclosed only after the search and seizure operation - The High Court emphasized that Explanation 5A of Section 271(1)(c) deems...

Validity of search and seizure u/s 132 - The Bombay High Court quashed the search and seizure actions conducted by the Income Tax Department u/s 132 of the Income Tax...

Search and seizure - seizure officer has authority to pass penalty order or not - The dispute raised before this Court that the search and seizure authority having...

The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) subsequent to the search and seizure action - In light of the judicial interpretations, the High Court found the penalty proceedings initiated...

Levy of penalty - goods were undervalued - The High Court, after careful consideration of legal precedents and statutory provisions, ruled in favor of the petitioner. It...

Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition of penalty - The Supreme Court sided with the appellant, holding that the substituted rule from...

The High Court quashed the seizure order dated 14.08.2020, holding that it violated Sections 7, 11, 46 and 47 of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 3(2) of the Foreign...

Addition of excess jewellery found in search - The Court interpreted CBDT Instruction 1916 and emphasized that it pertains to the seizure stage and does not dictate...

Priority of secured creditors under the SARFAESI Act over claims by the Income Tax Department. The respondent mortgaged the property to the petitioner in 2013-14, prior...

Penalty proceedings u/s 129(3) of UPGST Act - search and seizure is carried out at the godown - The High court, referring to a previous judgment, concluded that the...

Quick Updates: