Restoration of securities held by the appellant which were ...

Supreme Court orders firm to pay Rs. 21,70,143 plus 12% interest over unauthorized securities sale in landmark arbitration case.

May 15, 2024

Case Laws Indian Laws SC

Restoration of securities held by the appellant which were allegedly illegally sold by the respondent-firm - The Supreme Court adjudicated a complex arbitration dispute concerning unauthorized sale of securities. The case traversed multiple judicial forums, including arbitral tribunals, district courts, and high courts. The pivotal issues involved unauthorized sale, interest on awarded sums, and compensation for the petitioner. The Supreme Court, exercising its extraordinary jurisdiction, directed the respondent to pay the awarded amount of ₹21,70,143 with 12% simple interest per annum from 27th September 2013. This decision aimed to conclude the protracted litigation fairly, ensuring justice for the elderly petitioner.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Restoration of securities held by the appellant which were ...

Supreme Court orders firm to pay Rs. 21,70,143 plus 12% interest over unauthorized securities sale in landmark arbitration case.

May 15, 2024

Case Laws Indian Laws SC

You may also like:

Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, reversing the AO's disallowance of gold hire charges. The Tribunal found that the assessee company had valid Gold Hire Agreements...

Service of SCN - while attaching the bank locker, no SCN served on the petitioner to offer his explanation - the petitioner has issued fake GST invoices without supply...

Finance Bill 2025 provides "unprecedented tax relief" with income tax rebate increased to Rs 12 lakh per annum (Rs 12.75 lakh for salaried class after standard...

Court set aside auction sale on equitable grounds as entire amount due was deposited by respondents. Appellant deprived of using Rs.81,20,000 from 21.07.2019 till...

CESTAT determined appellant's entitlement to 12% per annum interest on refund amounts deposited during investigation, overruling Commissioner (Appeals) order of 6%. The...

Refund claim towards excess custom duty paid - same amount paid twice through oversight and bonafide mistake - The petitioner is entitled to get refund along with...

The appeal was made regarding the incorrect charge of interest u/s 234B of the Act in an order passed u/ss 254, 143(3), and 153A. The issue was whether the assessee...

Disallowance u/s.40(b) - remuneration paid to partners - requirement of discloser in Clause 21(c) of Form 3CD - Although the details referred to in Clause 21(c) does...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153(1) - Period of limitation - In this case, since, the Assessing Officer cannot invoke jurisdiction u/s.144C(1) and pass draft...

Disallowance of interest expenditure in the hands of partner - investment as capital in the business of the partnership firm - Absence of earning any interest income on...

Enhancement of late fee/penalty levied u/s 70 of FA - only the persons who are liable to pay service tax, have to file the return on time else they are liable to pay...

Revision u/s 263 - period of limitation - the case was re-assessed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 147 - the case of the assessee was again reopened and the assessment u/s. 143(3)...

Reduction of issued, subscribed, and paid-up equity share capital u/s 66 of the Companies Act, 2013. Compliance with Sections 66(1), 66(2), and 66(3) satisfied....

Loss on revaluation of security - securities maintained as per RBI Guidelines - only 30% treated as stock in trade - 70% treated as long term asset - HC

Quick Updates: