The case involved a challenge to the time limitation for filing ...

Court Allows Late Appeal Filing Due to Calculation Errors in UPGST Act Case, Urges Prompt Hearing on Merits.

May 22, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

The case involved a challenge to the time limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the UPGST Act. The High Court held that limitation provisions in tax laws serve to ensure timely compliance, discourage delays, and promote equal treatment of taxpayers. The petitioner received the order on July 12, 2022, and filed the appeal on November 10, 2022. The court found errors in the calculation of the time limit by the authorities, warranting the exercise of writ jurisdiction. The court directed the appellate authority to allow the delay in filing the appeal and proceed to hear the appeal on merits promptly, preferably within two months. The application was disposed of accordingly.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involved a challenge to the time limitation for filing ...

Court Allows Late Appeal Filing Due to Calculation Errors in UPGST Act Case, Urges Prompt Hearing on Merits.

May 22, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The High Court found a violation of the principles of natural justice due to the Assessing Authority's denial of an oral hearing opportunity. The court held that even if...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - sufficient cause for condoning the delay or not - The petitioner contended that despite the delay, their case had merit,...

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the rejection of the petitioner's request for cross-examination in a matter...

Error apparent on record rectified by allowing Revenue's appeal instead of wrongly dismissing it, as logical conclusion of upholding Revenue's contentions. Rectification...

Violation of principles of natural justice - technical glitch - Despite the Department's submission that the petitioner had been informed in advance about the correct...

The ITAT held that the disallowance of exemption claimed u/s 10(23C)(vi) due to a clerical error in the income tax return was improper. The order u/s 154 by CPC violated...

The High Court allowed the petitioner to rectify GSTR-1 for the months of October and November 2022 regarding five export invoices, despite the statutory time limit...

Rectification of mistake - ITAT has allows appeal on merit & dismissed the assessee’s cross objections as infructuous regarding re-opening of assessment. Assesse not...

The HC dismissed an application seeking to quash a show-cause notice and adjudication order. The Court found that despite multiple hearing notices sent both by post and...

Violation of principles of natural justice due to absence of appellant's counsel during proceedings. High Court noted counsel's absence on certain dates, but matter...

Validity of reopening of assessment - Re-opening notice u/s 148A(d) - personal hearing refused - the High court concluded that Section 148A(b) does not mandate a...

The Allahabad High Court addressed the denial of a personal hearing in a tax assessment case, emphasizing the mandatory nature of such hearings u/s 75(4) of the U.P. GST...

The High Court allowed the petitions challenging the assessment orders for 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20 on the grounds of limitation and violation of principles of...

Petitioner satisfied all requirements to claim benefits under Merchandise Export from India Scheme (MEIS) but failed to declare intent on shipping bills due to...

The Karnataka High Court addressed the issue of a Sub-Registrar refusing registration of a sale certificate due to pending Income Tax dues against the borrowers. The...

Quick Updates: