The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural ...

High Court case on denial of cross-examination for supari classification. Importance of cross-examination emphasized. Petitioner can appeal within 10 days.

July 4, 2024

Case Laws Customs HC

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the rejection of the petitioner's request for cross-examination in a matter concerning the classification of unflavoured and APL supari in relevant bills of entry. The court noted that the denial of cross-examination lacked a valid reason and referred to a Supreme Court ruling emphasizing the importance of cross-examination when witness statements are foundational to the order. The High Court allowed the petitioner to file a statutory appeal within ten days to be heard on merits without limitation issues, as the order in question was subject to appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural ...

High Court case on denial of cross-examination for supari classification. Importance of cross-examination emphasized. Petitioner can appeal within 10 days.

July 4, 2024

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did...

The AT rejected appellant's contention that denial of cross-examination of departmental officers violated natural justice principles. The tribunal distinguished between...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

The AT dismissed the appeals challenging denial of cross-examination requests for officers who recorded statements under the Customs Act and FERA. The tribunal...

Denial of cross-examination process of witness - ACIT restricted cross examination process by denying the questions asked by the Petitioner during cross examination -...

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the impugned order and remanded the cases back to the adjudicating authority. The appellants...

Dishonor of Cheque - seeking cross examination of the complainant officer of the bank - In the present application the recall, re-cross examination of the complainant is...

The summary focuses on the rejection of cross-examination of DRI officers and a co-noticee by the competent authority. The main objective of cross-examination is to...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - pre-mature appeal - The Tribunal ruled that the issue of denial of cross-examination could be...

Clandestine removal - The denial of cross-examination tantamount to violation of natural justice. The demand has wholly been raised, on the basis of the statements...

Clandestine removal of goods - the cross-examination of person from whose premises these documents had been recovered was necessary, more so when the same had been...

Principles of natural justice - rejection of cross-examination - The petitioner has approached this Court prematurely as the respondents have only rejected the request...

Wrong classification of goods - Cigar or Cigarette - cross-examination of witnesses - it is incumbent on the adjudicating authority to cross examine the persons whose...

Violation of principles of natural justice - opportunity for cross-examination. Evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be...

HC addressed a challenge regarding natural justice principles in adjudication proceedings. Petitioners sought cross-examination rights of DRI officers following Show...

Quick Updates: