The ITAT Delhi ruled on an appeal regarding addition u/s 68 ...

Tribunal Rules in Favor of Assessee: Unexplained Cash Deposits During Demonetization Deemed Justified, Addition Deleted.

May 23, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT Delhi ruled on an appeal regarding addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE for unexplained cash deposits during demonetization. The assessee explained that the deposits were from sale proceeds and past savings. The tribunal held that the AO did not find any discrepancies in the recorded purchases, sales, and stocks. Without evidence of non-genuine transactions or book rejection, assuming cash deposits based on higher turnover is unjustified. Therefore, the addition u/s 68 was deleted in favor of the assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT Delhi ruled on an appeal regarding addition u/s 68 ...

Tribunal Rules in Favor of Assessee: Unexplained Cash Deposits During Demonetization Deemed Justified, Addition Deleted.

May 23, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The ITAT Bangalore addressed unexplained cash deposits u/s 69A, focusing on the credibility of earlier withdrawals as a source for redeposits. The Tribunal examined fund...

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

The Appellate Tribunal considered unexplained cash deposits during demonetization. The Tribunal noted the assessee's agricultural income and expenses but found...

The ITAT decided in favor of the assessee, a doctor residing in the United Kingdom. The unexplained cash deposits in the assessee's Indian bank account during the...

Addition u/s 69A - cash deposits during demonetization period - business of hiring of cars - A reasonable amount of cash deposits during demonetization period is out of...

Unexplained cash deposits - Deposits in regular bank account of the assessee, during demonetization period - the assessee was maintaining complete stock tally, the sales...

During the demonetization period, the assessee deposited Rs. 36.50 lacs in Specified Bank Notes (SBNs) in their bank account. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition...

The assessee's unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were deleted by the CIT(A) after accepting the submissions that the cash receipts from various sources like cash sales,...

The assessee made cash deposits during the demonetization period which were treated as unexplained u/s 69A. However, the Tribunal held that the cash deposits were within...

The ITAT Delhi considered an addition u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE for cash deposited during demonetization as unexplained. The assessee's explanation of cash deposits from...

Deposits by the assessee in bank account during demonetization period were not unexplained. Section 69A is inapplicable as there were proper entries for cash sales, cash...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of addition u/s 69A with reference to cash deposits during demonetization. The assessee failed to establish the source of...

The ITAT Visakhapatnam addressed an addition u/s 69A for unexplained cash deposits in the bank account. The assessee failed to explain the sources for cash deposits,...

ITAT ruled in favor of the taxpayer regarding disputed cash deposits during demonetization. The assessee had properly recorded cash sales in accounting books and...

Addition made u/s. 69A - unexplained cash deposits - The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's argument that the cash on hand at the beginning of the financial year...

Quick Updates: