The ITAT Delhi ruled on an appeal regarding addition u/s 68 ...

ITAT held that cash deposits during demonetization were justified as the AO did not find any discrepancies in the assessee's books of accounts.

Case Laws Income Tax

May 23, 2024

The ITAT Delhi ruled on an appeal regarding addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE for unexplained cash deposits during demonetization. The assessee explained that the deposits were from sale proceeds and past savings. The tribunal held that the AO did not find any discrepancies in the recorded purchases, sales, and stocks. Without evidence of non-genuine transactions or book rejection, assuming cash deposits based on higher turnover is unjustified. Therefore, the addition u/s 68 was deleted in favor of the assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT Delhi ruled on an appeal regarding addition u/s 68 ...

ITAT held that cash deposits during demonetization were justified as the AO did not find any discrepancies in the assessee's books of accounts.

Case Laws Income Tax

May 23, 2024

You may also like:

Unexplained cash deposits - Deposits in regular bank account of the assessee, during demonetization period - the assessee was maintaining complete stock tally, the sales...

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

Cash credit u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - cash deposit during demonetization period - assessee's failure to maintain books of accounts u/s 44AD. Held that where exemption from...

Assessing Officer conducted due enquiries regarding cash deposits during demonetization period, called for details from assessee to substantiate source. AO applied mind,...

Deposits by the assessee in bank account during demonetization period were not unexplained. Section 69A is inapplicable as there were proper entries for cash sales, cash...

The case involved the scope of limited scrutiny and the validity of a notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny to...

During the demonetization period, the assessee deposited Rs. 36.50 lacs in Specified Bank Notes (SBNs) in their bank account. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition...

Cash deposits made during demonetization period from cash withdrawals and rental income received in cash were substantiated through cash flow statements and bank...

Unexplained Cash deposit during demonetization - Assessee is regular in filing his Return of Income for more than nine years and has already shown his books of accounts...

The ITAT Visakhapatnam addressed an addition u/s 69A for unexplained cash deposits in the bank account. The assessee failed to explain the sources for cash deposits,...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of addition u/s 69A with reference to cash deposits during demonetization. The assessee failed to establish the source of...

Cash deposited post demonetization period - AO making the addition of 30% of the cash deposited in the bank during post demonetization period - addition made by the AO...

Addition on account of deposit of cash during the demonetization period - allegation of sham transactions - the AO has acted on mere surmise and conjectures without duly...

Unexplained investments in the form of Specified Bank Notes (SBNs) deposited during demonetization period were questioned. The assessee claimed the deposits were trade...

Valuation by DVO - addition based on estimated cost disregarding actual cost as per books - applicability of section 142A before amendment - non-rejection of books - AO...

Quick Updates: