The Karnataka High Court addressed the estimation of 'pit ...

Tribunal's remand to reassess 'pit filling' expenses was justified. No substantial question of law arises.

Case Laws Income Tax

May 29, 2024

The Karnataka High Court addressed the estimation of 'pit filling' expenses. The CIT(Appeals) partially allowed the appeal by setting the pit filling expenses at Rs. 104 per ton. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)'s estimation baseless and directed the assessing officer to review it after giving the assessee a chance to be heard. The Court held that the revenue did not claim the Tribunal's decision was unreasonable. The Tribunal's order for reassessment did not favor either party. No significant legal issues arose from the Tribunal's decision.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Karnataka High Court addressed the estimation of 'pit ...

Tribunal's remand to reassess 'pit filling' expenses was justified. No substantial question of law arises.

Case Laws Income Tax

May 29, 2024

You may also like:

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

Input Tax Credit (ITC) - we do not agree with the applicant’s view that the land filling pit falls under plant and machinery. However, the discussion would be incomplete...

Jurisdiction of civil court u/s 34 of SARFAESI Act was in question. Suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction was rejected by lower courts under Order...

Prayer for remand - Tribunal upon reconsideration of the factual position, found no justifiable reason to accept the prayer of the assessee to remand the matter to the...

The High Court held that the order u/s 263 made no reference to the issue of depreciation, and the Tribunal had correctly answered the question by stating that the...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the disallowance of club expenses to determine if they were incurred for business purposes. It held that the Assessing Officer's...

Condonation of delay - when substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other, the cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred - AT

Bogus LTCG - onus to prove - Penny stock purchases - Claim made u/s 10(38) denied - ITAT remanded the matter back - Where all the evidence had been produced and the...

Nature of expenses - Relaunch expenses - deferred revenue expenditure claimed to the extent of 1/3rd in each of the year -The tribunal disagreed with the AO's...

Disallowance as per order u/s 144C - default in filling of form 35A - The appellant filed a corrected Form No. 35A. The Tribunal ruled that this correction did not...

Accrual of income - Reimbursement of expenses treated as income of the Assessee - Application of Markup on Reimbursement Expenses: The contentious issue was whether the...

Nature of expenditure - There is a clear finding of fact by the Tribunal that the legal expenses incurred by the Assessee were for protecting its business - High Court...

Condonation of delay filling appeals - The Tribunal, after thorough analysis, decided to condone the delay, considering the principle of substantial justice. It also...

The case pertains to additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of bogus share application money and commission for bogus accommodation entries. The ITAT deleted...

Substantial question of law to be made out u/s 260A or not? - Undisclosed income surrendered during the Search and Seizure action - to be taxed at normal rate or tax...

Quick Updates: