Revision u/s 263 challenged for lack of proper inquiry by ...

Cash deposits during demonetization, scrap sale, audit report scrutinized; ITAT's fact finding upheld.

Case Laws Income Tax

November 29, 2024

Revision u/s 263 challenged for lack of proper inquiry by Assessing Officer regarding cash deposits during demonetization, scrap sales, and non-submission of audit report. ITAT set aside revision order. Substantial question of law raised. Held that department only challenged factual findings of Tribunal. Supreme Court precedents establish that no substantial question of law arises from factual findings unless perverse. Perversity defined as finding without evidence, unreasonable, based on surmises or suspicion. Tribunal's factual finding perverse only if affecting substantial rights of assessee unreasonably based on record. Tribunal examined facts in detail before ruling in assessee's favor. No perversity found in Tribunal's fact finding.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 challenged for lack of proper inquiry by ...

Cash deposits during demonetization, scrap sale, audit report scrutinized; ITAT's fact finding upheld.

Case Laws Income Tax

November 29, 2024

You may also like:

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

Cash credit u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - cash deposit during demonetization period - assessee's failure to maintain books of accounts u/s 44AD. Held that where exemption from...

The appellant could not establish the source for cash deposits during demonetization. The Appellate Tribunal held that sales cannot be rejected solely based on higher...

Deposits by the assessee in bank account during demonetization period were not unexplained. Section 69A is inapplicable as there were proper entries for cash sales, cash...

Unexplained cash deposits - Deposits in regular bank account of the assessee, during demonetization period - the assessee was maintaining complete stock tally, the sales...

The assessee's unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were deleted by the CIT(A) after accepting the submissions that the cash receipts from various sources like cash sales,...

The ITAT Visakhapatnam addressed an addition u/s 69A for unexplained cash deposits in the bank account. The assessee failed to explain the sources for cash deposits,...

Addition u/s 69A being cash deposit in the Bank A/c during the demonetization period - cash deposit out of the sale proceeds effected prior to the ban of currency notes...

Addition u/s 69A - cash deposits during demonetization period - business of hiring of cars - A reasonable amount of cash deposits during demonetization period is out of...

Cash deposits made during demonetization period from cash withdrawals and rental income received in cash were substantiated through cash flow statements and bank...

Additions u/s 69A - Cash deposits made during demonetization period - there is no dispute that the assessee is running Petrol and Diesel retail outlet and he is the...

Cash deposits made post demonetization represented unaccounted income of the assessee qua AY 2017-2018 - Having regard to the extensive material which has been examined...

Addition u/s 69A - Addition of cash deposits made by the assessee during the demonetization period - The Tribunal examined the legality of the assessment order, the...

Additions against Cash deposits made during demonetization period in specified bank notes - assessee has been consistently holding huge cash balance which meets the...

The assessee, a septuagenarian gynecologist with no business income during the year, made cash deposits totaling Rs. 10 lakh in her bank account during demonetization....

Quick Updates: