CESTAT NEW DELHI held that the appellant mis-declared quantity ...

Tribunal Upholds Penalties for Misrepresentation, Overvaluation, and Non-Compliance in Export Fraud Case.

June 1, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

CESTAT NEW DELHI held that the appellant mis-declared quantity and quality, overvalued goods, and failed to comply with Advance Authorization requirements. Allegations of concealment and suppression of facts were proven, as the appellant utilized a lapsed authorization for importing goods. Procedural irregularities in sample drawl and examination were noted, with discrepancies in fabric composition. The appellant failed to discharge export obligations and suffered financial losses due to non-cooperation. The appellant's attempt to export goods as a third party exporter was fraudulent. The order of confiscation and penalties imposed were upheld, as the appellant failed to refute findings and evidence presented by the department. Both appeals were dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT NEW DELHI held that the appellant mis-declared quantity ...

Tribunal Upholds Penalties for Misrepresentation, Overvaluation, and Non-Compliance in Export Fraud Case.

June 1, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

The Appellate Tribunal considered the levy of penalty u/s 270A. The Assessing Officer (AO) imposed the penalty u/s 270A(9)(a) for misrepresentation of facts and...

The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside the assessment order for the assessee and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for a de novo assessment after...

Disallowance of commission paid to foreign agents - The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of commission expenses to both domestic and non-resident companies due to the...

The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine and penalty for importing old clothing. Referring to a previous case, it upheld confiscation due to non-compliance but decreased...

Penalty imposed u/s 271B for non-compliance with section 44AB audit report filing. Assessee failed to prove attending litigations or financial difficulties. Assessee...

Revocation of Customs Broker License - Overvaluation and misdeclaration with intent to claim drawback under section 75 of Customs Act, 1962 - The tribunal acknowledged...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) due to the Accountant's Covid-19...

ITAT set aside penalty under s.272A(1)(d) imposed on appellant, a small fruit vendor, for alleged non-compliance with notices under s.142(1)/143(2) during...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) during reassessment proceedings....

Levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - Non compliance to the notice(s) issued during the course of assessment proceedings - The ITAT noted that the assessee did respond to...

Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance - The assessee has shown sufficient cause for non-compliance, moreover, such non-compliance was done by...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowances in the quantum assessment order - whether any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars proved? - Tribunal directs...

Quick Updates: