Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2024 Year 2024 This

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, ...


Tribunal Upholds INR 10 Crore Forfeiture by Creditors Due to Invalid Guarantees in Resolution Plan Dispute.

June 3, 2024

Case Laws     Insolvency and Bankruptcy     AT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, addressed the issue of forfeiture of INR 10 Crores by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) led by State Bank of India (SBI) and the alleged restraint by CoC. The Tribunal held that the forfeiture was lawful u/s Resolution Plan terms. The Appellant's failure to provide valid bank guarantees and meet financial commitments justified the forfeiture. The CoC's actions were deemed appropriate, and the Appellant's contentions were rejected. The Tribunal also found the Appellant's contradictory stance on the nature of the deposit. Referring to IBBI, the Tribunal concluded that there was no cause to proceed u/s Section 74(3) of the Code against the Appellant. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the forfeiture as per Resolution Plan and CIRP Regulations.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Appellate Tribunal affirmed the decision to exclude the Appellant and other unsecured Financial Creditors from the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The key issues were...

  2. The ITAT held that the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 were beyond the 10-year limitation period u/s 153C read with Explanation-1 to section 153A. Hence,...

  3. Maintainability of petition seeking initiation of CIRP against Personal Guarantor/Respondent - invocation of Bank guarantee and time limitation - The case involved an...

  4. CIRP - Classification of the claim - Claim as contingent due to pending litigation - Citing legal precedent, the Tribunal upheld the classification of the claim at a...

  5. Exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - Threshold limit of Rs. 1 Crore - The Appellate Tribunal found that the appellant's gross receipts, when considering certain fee receipts...

  6. The appellant's customs broker (CB) license revocation, penalty imposition, and security deposit forfeiture were challenged for alleged violations of Regulations 10(a),...

  7. CESTAT upheld a customs broker's appeal against license revocation, finding the licensing authority incorrectly applied regulations 10(d) and 10(e) of Customs Brokers...

  8. Developer directed to refund apartment booking amount exceeding 10% of Basic Sale Price (BSP) without interest to purchaser following cancellation. SC upheld NCDRC's...

  9. ₹ 1,10,828 crore GST Gross Revenue collected for January, 2020

  10. Customs Broker license revocation, security deposit forfeiture, and penalty imposition under Regulations 10(a), (d), (e), and (n) of CBLR challenged. Regulation 10(a)...

  11. Customs broker's license suspension case involving violations of Regulations 10(d) and 10(e) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018. Gross mis-declaration...

  12. The Appellate Tribunal held that personal guarantors who have not made any payment towards discharge of their guarantee cannot be considered financial creditors of the...

  13. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi addressed issues regarding debt default, impact of One Time Settlement (OTS) Agreement, and...

  14. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the Resolution Plan must provide for payment of Provident Fund and Gratuity dues in accordance with Section...

  15. The case involved revocation of a Customs Broker (CB) license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposition due to misuse of Transfer of Residence (TR)...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates