The case involved a dispute regarding the demand of differential ...

CESTAT rules in favor of appellant in Customs Act case. Permit for passenger service can be used for charter services.

June 5, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

The case involved a dispute regarding the demand of differential duty u/s 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 for using a helicopter for NSOP (Charter) despite having a permit for NSOP (Passenger). The Tribunal held that the permit for NSOP (Passenger) can be used for charter services based on previous rulings. The definition of 'Private Aircraft' was clarified, stating that if an aircraft is used for remuneration, it is considered a public transport aircraft. The appellant's use of the helicopter for commercial flights fell under the category of 'Private Aircraft'. As the helicopter was used for non-scheduled (Passenger) services, there was no violation of the exemption notification. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involved a dispute regarding the demand of differential ...

CESTAT rules in favor of appellant in Customs Act case. Permit for passenger service can be used for charter services.

June 5, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Classification of service - providing chartered flights to various organization - to be classified under Transport of Passenger by Air Service or supply of tangible...

Classification of service provided by company - Not Chartered Accountant Services or Market Research Agency's Services - Nature of services rendered includes...

CESTAT Mumbai addressed CENVAT Credit issues on Rent-a-Cab services and insurance services u/s Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Rent-a-Cab services were denied...

Disllowance of CENVAT Credit - Rule 6(5) of CCR provides that the provisions of Rule 6(1), (2) and (3) are not applicable, where input service received is used both for...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of CENVAT Credit for insurance services and air travel agency services u/s Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It was...

CENVAT Credit - input services - services used for activities related to its corporate social responsibility [CSR] - there could be services which are used by the...

The CESTAT held that the appellant's services could not be classified as intermediary services for the period July 2012 to March 2014. As per Rule 3 of the Place of...

Export of services or not - Reversal of Credit - The fundamental charge that the service recipients are ‘other establishments’ of service providers in terms of in terms...

Notification under rule 6A of Service Tax Rules - rebate of the duty paid on excisable inputs or service tax and cess paid on all input services used in providing ...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Refund of unutilised CENVAT Credit - intermediary services or not - POPOS Rules - export of services - The learned CESTAT has rightly concluded that all services except...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - input services - nexus with the out put service - the department is not permitted to question the eligibility of CENVAT credit at the time of...

CESTAT ruled against Revenue's contention that services constituted intermediary services u/r 9 of Place of Provision of Service Rules, 2012. The Tribunal emphasized...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - input services - input services in respect of STPI unit and used the same in the export of services - In view of the clarification given by the...

The CESTAT held that the services rendered by the appellant to overseas universities/colleges amounted to 'Export of Service' and not 'intermediary service'. It observed...

Quick Updates: