Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2024 Year 2024 This

The assessment reopening u/s 147 read with Section 148 was found ...


Improper reopening of assessment & addition without invoking relevant law provisions under Income Tax Act.

Case Laws     Income Tax

October 10, 2024

The assessment reopening u/s 147 read with Section 148 was found to be unsustainable due to the lack of independent application of mind by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) in granting approval. The CIT's approval was given in a slipshod manner without recording their own satisfaction, rendering the subsequent notice u/s 148 and assessment proceedings invalid. The addition made u/s 69 was also found to be improper as the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to invoke or apply any specific provision of law while making the addition. The AO did not specify the head under which the addition was made, whether business income, capital gains, or u/ss 48, 56, 68, or 69. Making an addition without invoking the relevant provision of the Act is against the law and liable to be deleted. The reasons for the addition cannot be supplemented by the assessment order or affidavit, and the assessee must be notified of the exact contravention or provision under which the assessment or additions are sought. Consequently, the addition sustained by the lower authorities deserves to be deleted, and the appeal allowed on merits.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

  2. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid due to procedural irregularities. The Assessing Officer initiated proceedings without verifying information and the...

  3. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reason to believe - there was tangible material before the AO to reopen the concluded assessment as the assessee is claiming huge...

  4. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - deemed dividend addition u/s 2(22)(e) - gap of more than four years - when the amount received by the two concerns from the loan giver...

  5. GST Authorities invoked penal provisions under Indian Penal Code against the petitioner without invoking penal provisions of GST Act, despite the alleged offences being...

  6. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reopening after expiry of four years - Original assessment have been passed under section 143(3) on Dated 14.12.2011 and A.O. recorded...

  7. The High Court held that GST Authorities cannot launch prosecution invoking penal provisions under the Indian Penal Code without invoking penal provisions of the GST...

  8. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - addition u/s 68 - The law regarding reopening of assessment is well-settled. The reliance placed upon the findings of the earlier...

  9. The High Court held that the reopening of the assessment based on a subsequent judgment that the transaction in question was amenable to tax was impermissible. Once an...

  10. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - while reopening no allegation was made by the learned AO of failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all...

  11. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Unexplained loan - There were no justification for the A.O. to record non-existing, incorrect and wrong facts in the reasons for...

  12. This case involves a challenge to an order of re-assessment under the relevant tax laws. The key points are: The petitioner failed to submit monthly returns within the...

  13. Validity of reopening of assessment - It is well settled Law that validity of the reassessment proceedings is to be judged with reference to the reasons recorded for...

  14. Assessment u/s 153C - Profit estimation on money received for new construction and redevelopment projects - extrapolation of income for the search period. The assessee...

  15. The assessment order was challenged on the grounds of validity of reopening after four years, based on a change of opinion and borrowed satisfaction. The assessee...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates