The case involved a dispute over the valuation of power units ...

Dispute Over Valuation of Power Units Resolved; Appeal Allowed, Penalty Deemed Unsustainable Without Duty Determination.

June 10, 2024

Case Laws Central Excise AT

The case involved a dispute over the valuation of power units supplied by one party to another, leading to a demand for differential duty, interest, and penalty. The appellant undervalued components supplied, resulting in undervaluation of the power units. The appellant's argument that they were not liable to pay duty under a different rule was rejected as they had chosen a specific duty payment procedure. The recalculation of interest was found to be time-barred under Section 11A. The penalty imposed under Section 11AC was deemed unsustainable as duty determination under Section 11A was lacking. The decision was in line with the Supreme Court's ruling that penalty under Section 11AC applies only after a duty determination under Section 11A. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant by the CESTAT.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involved a dispute over the valuation of power units ...

Dispute Over Valuation of Power Units Resolved; Appeal Allowed, Penalty Deemed Unsustainable Without Duty Determination.

June 10, 2024

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Profit of eligible unit by on account Baggase Purchase u/s 80-IA(8) r.w.s. 80-IA (10) - Assessee’s manufacturing unit has sold “bagaase” to assessee’s power unit at Rs....

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

Valuer assigned separate valuation to different parts of unit for arriving at a proper valuation for transfer of the entire unit in the valuation report of the unit...

Imported material diverted to unit other than permitted unit, resulting in contravention of import-export policy provisions. Goods held liable for confiscation u/s 111...

Determining the ALP under transfer pricing provisions - Determination of market value of of electricity - When a captive power plant in an industry supplies electricity...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim u/s 80C - The Tribunal found that there was a discrepancy in the application of penalties by the lower authorities. - While the...

Duty demand - Clubbing of turnover of the Job workers - dispute regarding Valuation - dummy units or not - If the department disputed the price at which excise duty paid...

Transfer pricing adjustment - Determination of arm's length price for power transferred by assessee's captive power plant to non-eligible manufacturing units, reducing...

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

INDIRECT TAX DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCHEME, 2016 - Power to make rules - Clause 215 of the Bill

DIRECT TAX DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCHEME, 2016 - Power to remove difficulties - Clause no. 207 of the Bill

HC reduced penalty from Rs. 17.10 lakhs to Rs. 10,000 for a SEZ unit's failure to achieve positive Net Foreign Exchange Earnings (NFE) in 2008-09. The unit's inability...

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal on the issue of disallowance of deduction u/s 80-IA. It held that the arm's length price for transfer of power from the captive...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) related to the addition of closing stock. The AO levied penalty on an addition u/s 36(1)(iii) that...

Deemed export - the electric power (electricity) is a "consumable" as per para 9.15 of FTP - the petitioner is entitled to have deemed export benefit for its supply from...

Quick Updates: