The ITAT held that the addition u/s 69C r.w.s.115BBE for ...

Addition u/s 69C r.w.s.115BBE - Furniture import expenditure not recorded in books. No proof of business relation with China supplier. Custom duty paid. Appeal dismissed.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 11, 2024

The ITAT held that the addition u/s 69C r.w.s.115BBE for unexplained import expenditure was justified as the assessee failed to record the expenditure in the books. Lack of proof of past business relation with China-based supplier raised doubts on credit imports. The payment of custom duty was acknowledged, but the explanation provided did not meet the standard of human probabilities. The assessee's failure to prove import agreement conditions led to dismissal of the appeal. The alternative plea for relief on custom duty was rejected as lower authorities had already granted relief and sec.69C proviso barred further addition. Assessee's appeal was dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT held that the addition u/s 69C r.w.s.115BBE for ...

Addition u/s 69C r.w.s.115BBE - Furniture import expenditure not recorded in books. No proof of business relation with China supplier. Custom duty paid. Appeal dismissed.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 11, 2024

You may also like:

Disallowance of contingency expenses claimed by the assessee. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the contingency expenses despite acknowledging that the total cost...

Unaccounted cash payments / expenditure - unaccounted cash receipts from patients - Addition u/s 69C - levy of tax u/s 115BBE at higher rate of tax - proof of source of...

Additions cannot be made u/s 69C of the Act, as unexplained expenditure, towards difference between purchase price found in loose slips and amount recorded in books of account - AT

Assessment u/s 153A - unexplained investment in Hotel Building - addition under sec 69 r.w.s. 115BBE - reliance on DVO report post-search - Held, DVO report...

Addition u/s 69C – Unexplained expenditure - only because parties has given a different accounting treatment in its books of account, it cannot be said that the assessee...

Profit estimation on unaccounted turnover: AO estimated 8% profit based on seized material, which was reduced to 5% by CIT(A). ITAT held that in case of profit...

Addition made u/s 69C - Unexplained huge expenditure to earn Agriculture income - once the assessee has not made any investment, the addition made u/s 69C of the Act is illegal.

Addition u/s 69C - CIT(A) deleted the addition - in order to invoke the provisions of sec. 69C, should give a categorical finding that the assessee has incurred any...

Jurisdictional issue regarding notice u/s 143(2) was addressed, with ITAT holding that the initial notice by ACIT, Circle-5(1), Delhi was within time, and subsequent...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal examined the determination of net profits from contract business, rejection of books of accounts, and addition u/s 40(a)(ia) for...

Unexplained expenditure u/s. 69C - CIT(A) held that the AO was not justified in assuming that the assessee had made unaccounted purchases solitary on the basis that the...

Additions u/s 69C - unexplained expenditure - the provisions of section 69C of the Act, will apply but consequent loss is to be set-off against this income. As regards...

Digital images and Excel files found on partner's phone cannot be relied upon for making additions u/s 69C for unexplained expenditure. Loose papers and documents not...

Addition u/s 69 r.w.s. 115BBE - Higher rate of tax treating the surrendered income as unexplained investment / income - Amount surrendered during a survey due to stock...

Claim of Expenditure on hawala business - Assessee also did not submit any proof of incurring any expenditure. Income was also not assessed on net basis @ 0.30 %. No...

Quick Updates: